IHM Senior Living Community
Monroe, Michigan · CCN 235648
15 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 37
- Surveys
- 15
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 58
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- SAINT THERESE SENIOR COMMUNITIES
- County
- Monroe
- Medicare-certified since
- 2009
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=6, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Mar 28, 2024
956 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.63 | 4.66 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.01 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 40.8% | 34.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3100.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at IHM Senior Living Community, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Aug 27, 2026
This citation pertains to intake 3006508.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report within two hours, a fall with serious injury for one resident (R103) of three residents reviewed for falls.Findings include: Record review revealed on 04/25/2026, R103 attempted a transfer without assistance, resulting in a fall which caused serious injury. By order of the physician, 911 was called and R103 was transferred to the hospital and diagnosed with a left displaced femoral neck fracture. R103 underwent a left hip hemiarthroplasty. The post fall assessment by Nurse B described the unwitnessed fall as causing acute pain with facial grimacing. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578Mar 28, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure legal representatives completed or revised DNR (Do Not Resuscitate- Withholding life sustaining treatment) for two (R16 and R40) cognitively impaired residents reviewed for Advance Directives, potentially resulting in inaccurate life sustaining or life withholding medical treatment. Findings include: Resident #40 (R40) On 3/26/24 at 10:44 a.m., R40 was observed in the room, in a wheelchair sitting at the bedside. R40 appeared disheveled and agitated. R40 did not verbalize the reason for the agitation and did not want to participate in an interview. On 3/26/24 at 2:34 p.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF758Mar 28, 2024
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to adequately monitor the effectiveness of a psychotropic medication (taken to exert an effect to the chemical makeup of brain) for two residents (R5 and R39) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R5 Record review of R5's electronic medical record revealed admission to facility on 8/17/23 with a pertinent diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R5 had impaired cognition and required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLS). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Mar 28, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly store a nebulizer mask (used for breathing treatments), for one resident (R23) out of 14 residents reviewed for infection control, resulting in the potential for placing a vulnerable population at high risk for cross-contamination and infection. Findings include: On 3/26/24 at 10:19 AM R23's nebulizer mask was observed lying on a paper towel in a plastic tray not in a bag. R23 stated I use the nebulizer two to three times per day. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF602Apr 19, 2021
This citation pertains to intake MI 193. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the diversion of resident medication (controlled substances) for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #401) reveiwed for medications, resulting in controlled substance diversion for suspected staff use. Findings include: On 4/19/21 at 9:00AM an interview was conducted with the Director of Health Care Center (A) regarding a missing narcotic blister pack (card that contained 30 narcotic pills) and the corresponding document (narcotic receipt sheet). Director (A) stated, there were missing narcotic drugs ([MEDICATION(S)]) discovered at the facility on 4/3/21 at 6PM. I was made aware of the situation on 4/4/21. The missing pills belonged to resident (401). […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 37 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 27, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Mar 28, 2024Standard3 findings
- Apr 19, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Feb 3, 2021Standard1 finding
- Oct 10, 2019Standard7 findings
- Aug 30, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jan 10, 2019Standard and complaint6 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 2, 2017Standard and complaint2 findings
Show the 7 earlier surveys
- Oct 5, 2016Standard4 findings
- Nov 19, 2014Standard2 findings
- Sep 14, 2012—2 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 29, 2011—1 finding
- Nov 22, 2011—4 findings
- Oct 11, 2011—1 finding
- Mar 1, 2011—1 finding · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction