Deficiency Index

Idaho State Veterans Home - Pocatello

Pocatello, Idaho · CCN 135132

11 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
60
Surveys
11
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse3

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file8/11

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
66
Ownership
Government - State
Chain
Independent
County
Bannock
Medicare-certified since
2007

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
3
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=14, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Aug 7, 2025

459 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.953.76
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.61—
Annual nurse turnover48.6%51.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2087.0%E28.7%F14.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 23 of the 60 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6092×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5781×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Idaho State Veterans Home - Pocatello, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF578Aug 7, 2025

    Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents and their representative received assistance to exercise their right to formulate an Advance Directive. This was true for 10 of 54 residents (#1, #2, #4, #9, #19, #26, #27, #29, #46, and #55) whose records were reviewed for advance directives. This deficient practice created the potential for harm or adverse outcomes if the residents' wishes were not followed or documented regarding their advance care planning. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Aug 7, 2025

    Based on the facility Bowel Management Protocol, record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow the facility bowel care standing order of delivering specific medications when residents do not have BM within 72 hours for 5 of 16 Residents (#5, #9, #11, #26, and #35) who records were reviewed for bowel and bladder care. This failed practice created the potential for residents to experience discomfort when medications were not administered according to the physician's order. Findings include:The facility Bowel Management Protocol dated 4/2018, documented a resident's bowel movement(s) will be documented in Point of Care every shift. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Aug 7, 2025

    Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity. This was true for 1 of 4 residents (Residents #19) observed for covered urinary drainage bag. This deficient practice had the potential for residents to experience embarrassment, and low feelings of self-worth. Findings include: Resident #19 was admitted on [DATE] with readmit on 6/17/24, with multiple diagnoses including heart failure, diabetes, and obstructive uropathy (condition when urine cannot drain through the urinary tract). On 8/4/25 at 2:31 PM, Resident #19's urinary drainage bag was uncovered and visible from the open doorway of his room. On 8/4/25 at 3:26 PM, the DON stated the urinary drainage bag should have been covered and was not.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF600Aug 7, 2025

    Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident's rights to be free from abuse were protected. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #61) whose record was reviewed for resident-to-resident abuse. This failure placed residents at risk for potential abuse and potential physical and psychosocial harm. Findings include:The facility Freedom from Resident Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, and Exploitation policy dated 2024, documented each resident.has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse.Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including dementia and history of falling. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Aug 7, 2025

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents Minimum Data Set (MDS) had correct assessment information. This was true for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #46) reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessments. This deficient practice created the potential for residents to have their mental health needs not met due to inaccurate assessments. Findings include:Chapter 3 of The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), revised 10/1/2024, documented if a resident is currently considered by the state level II PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) process to have a serious mental illness, then section A1500 of the MDS should be marked yes.Chapter 5 of the RAI documented if an MDS assessment is found to have… […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 60 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 7, 2025Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Jul 19, 2024Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Aug 17, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 24, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Aug 9, 2019Standard10 findings
  • Mar 8, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Dec 1, 2016Standard2 findings
  • Aug 28, 2015Standard6 findings
Show the 3 earlier surveys
  • Apr 25, 2014Standard5 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 15, 2013—10 findings
  • Dec 2, 2011Standard10 findings · 2 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction