Aspen Park of Cascadia

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Aspen Park of Cascadia, in the surveyor’s own words.

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF557Jul 23, 2026

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were able to use their personal property as needed. This was true for one of one resident (Resident #35) reviewed for residents' rights. This deficient practice created the potential for Resident #35 to experience a violation of her right to use her personal property, loss of trust in staff, and emotional distress when staff changed the orientation of the batteries in her remote control. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF584Jul 23, 2026

  Based on interviews and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment. This was true for one of one resident (Resident #10) reviewed for quality of life, whose sleep was affected by her roommate's loud television (TV) volume. This failure created the potential for Resident #10 to be deprived of sleep, affecting comfort and overall well-being. Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Homelike Environment, revised 9/17/25, described Comfortable Sound Levels as Noise levels that do not interfere with hearing, enhance privacy when desired, and encourage interaction during social activities.The facility's policy titled, Quality of Life, revised 6/4/25, documented the facility was committed to… […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF585Jul 23, 2026

  Based on review of records, policy review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure an ongoing resident's concern was recognized and addressed as a grievance. This was true for one of one resident (Resident #10) whose ongoing concern regarding her roommate's TV volume was not addressed. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect Resident #10's quality of life and satisfaction with care. Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Grievance Process, revised 8/29/25, documented the Grievance program was utilized to address the concerns of residents, family members and visitors, and the facility should make prompt efforts to resolve grievances. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Jul 23, 2026

  Based on policy review, record review, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' care plan interventions were implemented as written. Specifically, staff did not follow the resident's care plan regarding the management of his hearing aid and the required storage of his smoking paraphernalia. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #36) whose care plan was reviewed. This failure created the potential for unmet needs, safety concerns, and a decline in Resident #36's physical and psychosocial well being.a. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF690Jul 23, 2026

  Based on record review, policy review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure indwelling catheter care was implemented for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #19) whose records were reviewed for catheter care. This failure created the potential for Resident #19 to not receive appropriate catheter care to his suprapubic catheter. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Indwelling Catheters, revised 9/25/25 documented, 1. An indwelling catheter is used only when a resident's clinical condition demonstrates that catheterization is necessary. Care and treatment are provided to help the resident restore their highest level of normal bladder function as possible and to reduce catheter associated complications such as a urinary tract infection .andf. […]