Deficiency Index

Hunters Creek Nursing and Rehab Center

Orlando, Florida · CCN 105987

23 surveys since 2011, 11 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
84
Surveys
23
Harm or worse
11
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
8
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy8

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file16/23

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
116
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS
County
Orange
Medicare-certified since
1998

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=17, floor 20).

Last survey on record

May 22, 2026

171 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.033.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.76—
Annual nurse turnover35.6%44.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$67,191 across 3 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ214.3%K—L—
Actual harmG17.1%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD964.3%E17.1%F17.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 14 of the 84 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Hunters Creek Nursing and Rehab Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Sep 20, 2024

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect by not ensuring staff implemented measures to mitigate the risk and prevent elopement for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for elopement, of a total sample of 13 residents, (#1). These failures contributed to the elopement of resident #1 and placed him at risk for serious injury, harm, and/or death. While resident #1 was out of the facility unsupervised, there was likelihood he could have died , been accosted by unknown persons, become lost, or hit by a vehicle. On [DATE], resident #1, a [AGE] year-old male was admitted to the facility from the hospital. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Sep 20, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and a secure environment to prevent elopement for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for elopement, of a total sample of 13 residents, (#1). These failures contributed to the elopement of resident #1 and placed him at risk for serious life-threatening injury or even death. While resident #1 was out of the facility unsupervised, there was high likelihood he could have sustained serious life-threatening injuries, become lost, been accosted by a stranger, or hit by a motor vehicle and died . On [DATE] at 6:28 PM, resident #1 exited the facility's front entrance when the receptionist unlocked the door for him to leave the facility. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Nov 14, 2024

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to adequately evaluate skin integrity and promptly intervene to prevent the development and worsening of a pressure injury for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure injuries, of a total sample of 9 residents, (#1). The facility's failure to identify early stages of skin breakdown, promptly initiate wound care and treatment, and develop nursing interventions to promote wound healing resulted in actual physical and psychosocial harm for resident #1. The resident's skin was intact on admission to the facility and within 12 days, she was diagnosed with a stage 4, full-thickness skin loss pressure injury. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 18, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food products were stored correctly in the walk-in cooler, and failed to ensure the temperature of hot foods being held was taken before service in accordance with professional food service safety. Findings: 1. On 12/15/24 at 11:50 AM, during a tour of the walk-in refrigerator with [NAME] D, a small plastic bag holding approximately 12 turkey slices, dated 12/11 (five days ago) was noted. [NAME] D stated the facility policy was to discard perishable food items three days after they were opened, and she removed it to be discarded. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Dec 18, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity for 4 of 15 dependent diners at the facility, out of a total sample of 32 residents, (#11 and #48). 1. Review of resident #11's medical record revealed she was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis) and hemiparesis (one-sided weakness) following a stroke affecting her right dominant side, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and aphasia (language disorder). Review of resident #11's Minimum Data Set quarterly assessment with Assessment Reference Date of 11/05/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status was not obtained because she was rarely or never understood. […]

Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 84 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 22, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 18, 2024Standard4 findings
  • Nov 14, 2024Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 20, 2024Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 18, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 29, 2023Standard2 findings
  • Jan 19, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 17, 2021Standard1 finding
Show the 15 earlier surveys
  • May 5, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 2, 2020Infection control1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 27, 2020Standard4 findings
  • Nov 8, 2018Standard7 findings
  • Aug 22, 2017Complaint5 findings · 5 harm
  • Jul 29, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Aug 11, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Sep 30, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 27, 2014Standard8 findings
  • Apr 11, 2013—11 findings
  • Sep 27, 2012—3 findings
  • Feb 17, 2012—7 findings
  • Nov 15, 2011—3 findings · 2 harm
  • Sep 19, 2011—1 finding
  • Mar 3, 2011—7 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction