Deficiency Index

Houston House

Houston, Missouri · CCN 265470

12 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2022.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
39
Surveys
12
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file7/12

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
96
Ownership
For profit - Individual
Chain
CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES
County
Texas · rural
Medicare-certified since
1991

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 113 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Missouri.

Last survey on record

Apr 2, 2026

221 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.863.32
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.41—
Annual nurse turnover47.2%60.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2177.8%E414.8%F27.4%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 27 of the 39 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6412×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6902×

    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Houston House, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF888Mar 30, 2022

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 100% of the staff had been fully vaccinated for COVID-19 (a highly contagious virus that causes serious illness or death) or granted a qualifying exemption as recognized by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) when two facility staff members (Employee A and Employee B) had a medical exemption for a non-qualifying medical reason. In the four weeks prior to the onsite survey, 30 residents tested positive for COVID-19. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 2, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 74.Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage, revised November 2022, showed: - Dry foods and goods are handled and stored in a manner that maintains the integrity of the packaging until they are ready to use;- Food in designated dry storage areas are kept at least six inches (in.) off the floor (unless packaged for case lot handling, for example, dollies, pallets, racks and skids) and clear of sprinkler heads, sewage/waste disposal pipes and vents. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 14, 2023

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 74. The facility did not provide a dietary policy. Observations on 12/11/23 at 11:07 A.M., of the kitchen showed: - The top of the commercial range covered in food debris and a buildup of a brown substance; - The front door panel and the handle of the commercial range covered with a brown sticky substance; - An air vent located on the ceiling located near the entrance door covered with a dark brown substance; - 10 ceiling fluorescent light fixtures with no covers. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF638Oct 19, 2021

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) were completed a minimum of every three months for eight residents (Resident #1, Resident #6, Resident #12, Resident #18, Resident #19, Resident #189, Resident #190 and Resident #191). The facility census was 52. Record review of the facility's Resident Assessments policy, revised November 2019, showed the following: -A comprehensive assessment of every resident's needs is made at intervals designated by Omnibus Budget reconciliation Act (OBRA) and Prospective Payment System (PPS) requirements; -The Resident Assessment Coordinator is responsible for ensuring that the Interdisciplinary Team conducts timely and and appropriate… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF678Oct 19, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's choice of code status (the level of medical interventions a resident wishes to have if their heart or breathing stops) was clearly and consistently documented throughout the resident's medical record for three residents (Resident #7, Resident #21 and Resident #139). The facility census was 52. Record review of the facility's policy titled Advance Directives, revised ,d+[DATE], showed the following: -Advance directives will be respected in accordance with state law and facility policy; -Upon admission, the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive is he or she chooses to do… […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 39 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 2, 2026Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Feb 7, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Dec 14, 2023Standard5 findings
  • Aug 1, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 5, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 30, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 19, 2021Standard12 findings
  • May 24, 2019Standard1 finding
Show the 4 earlier surveys
  • Mar 24, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Apr 24, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Mar 16, 2012—1 finding
  • May 26, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction