Hope Springs Care Center
Montrose, Colorado · CCN 065195
27 surveys since 2011, 18 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 167
- Surveys
- 27
- Harm or worse
- 18
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 74
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE
- County
- Montrose · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1984
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 51 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Colorado.
Last survey on record
Dec 10, 2024
699 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.29 | 3.35 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.59 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 64.8% | 50.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $87,079 across 9 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G514.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1337.1% | E1440.0% | F38.6% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6002×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Hope Springs Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Dec 10, 2024
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services to treat and prevent pressure injuries for two (#46 and #50) of six residents reviewed for pressure ulcers out of 28 sample residents. Resident #46, who was known to be at risk for pressure injuries, was admitted on [DATE]. The resident had diagnoses of dementia, cognitive communication deficit, chronic pain, and generalized muscle weakness. On 11/11/24, Resident #46 developed a facility-acquired stage 2 pressure injury to her sacrum, however, the facility did not initiate further pressure ulcer interventions on the resident's pressure ulcer prevention care plan once the stage 2 pressure injury was identified and did not update the care plan to include the new pressure… […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF692Dec 10, 2024
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#31 and #50) of four residents reviewed for nutrition out of 28 sample residents received the care and services necessary to meet their nutritional needs and maintain their highest level practicable physical well-being. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility for long-term care on 8/12/24 with diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), depression and atrial fibrillation. Upon admission on 8/12/24, the resident weighed 120.8 lbs. On 10/17/24, Resident #31 weighed 94 pounds. Resident #31 lost 26.8 lbs (22.1%) in less than three months, which was considered severe. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Jul 20, 2022
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure four (#2, #3, #4, #12) of five residents reviewed for skin and pressure injuries, out of 13 sample residents, received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent and heal pressure injuries. Systematic failures were identified in the facility's pressure ulcer prevention and care practices, increasing the risk and worsening of facility acquired pressure injuries. The facility did not consistently provide ongoing monitoring of pressure ulcers, accurately assess and document skin conditions, pressure ulcers and interventions. The facility failed to show consistent oversight in pressure ulcer prevention and treatment. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF550Mar 24, 2022
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity. Residents reports that staff did not consistently: -Respond to their call lights in a timely manner; -Treat them and speak to them in a dignified manner; and, -Respond appropriately and timely when concerns were brought to their attention. Residents said it was wrong the way they were sometimes disrespected by staff and treated like children. As a result, residents used the words angry, aggravated, ridiculous and hurt to describe how they felt. Findings include: I. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Mar 24, 2022
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure two out of six residents reviewed for abuse out of 24 residents were kept free from abuse. Resident #32 and #3 expressed fear and anxiety about a situation that occurred with Resident #4 on 1/11/22. Resident #4 entered their room while they were inside, blocked the door, and began to yell at them. She told them she was going to shoot them and they were afraid she was going to start throwing items at them that were near the sink. Residents #32 and #3 both turned on their call lights for help but they were unable to get staff assistance during the situation and felt like they were being held hostage. […]
Read 36 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 36 of 167 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Dec 10, 2024Standard and complaint9 findings · 2 harm
- Nov 30, 2023Complaint4 findings
- Oct 11, 2023Complaint1 finding
- May 25, 2023Standard13 findings
- Mar 1, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Jul 20, 2022Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 24, 2022Standard8 findings · 3 harm
- Sep 7, 2021Complaint1 finding
Show the 19 earlier surveys
- Mar 1, 2021Standard and complaint11 findings · 3 harm
- Dec 1, 2020Infection control4 findings
- Sep 8, 2020Complaint5 findings · 2 harm
- Jun 9, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Oct 10, 2019Standard1 finding
- Jan 29, 2019Complaint6 findings
- Aug 16, 2018Standard4 findings
- Mar 15, 2018Complaint9 findings
- Dec 19, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Nov 9, 2017Complaint6 findings
- May 17, 2017Standard22 findings · 2 harm
- Dec 9, 2016Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 20, 2016Standard and complaint16 findings · 2 harm
- Aug 11, 2015Standard9 findings
- Sep 11, 2014Standard7 findings
- Aug 8, 2013—10 findings
- Sep 13, 2012—2 findings
- Aug 5, 2011—5 findings
- Mar 31, 2011—4 findings · 2 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Silver Heights Skilled Nursing and RehabilitationCastle Rock4 harm findings
- Canyon View Care CenterPalisade4 harm findings
- Westwood Post AcuteDenver8 harm findings
- Poudre Canyon Rehabilitation and Nursing, LLCFort Collins7 harm findings
- Mantey Heights Rehabilitation & Care CenterGrand Junction8 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction