Canyon View Care Center
Palisade, Colorado · CCN 065228
45 surveys since 2010, 15 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 250
- Surveys
- 45
- Harm or worse
- 15
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 88
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Mesa
- Medicare-certified since
- 1986
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 51 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Colorado.
Last survey on record
Feb 5, 2026
277 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.45 | 3.35 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.64 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 31.7% | 50.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $11,649 across 1 penalty
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J12.3% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G37.0% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2046.5% | E1637.2% | F37.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6894×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5833×
Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
- F5843×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6003×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6973×
Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Canyon View Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Nov 15, 2024
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that one (#1) of three out of six sample residents was kept safe and free from elopement. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (a chronic, progressive neurological condition) with dyskinesia (involuntary movements). A wander/elopement risk evaluation, completed upon the resident's admission on 8/31/24, revealed Resident #1 had no previous elopement attempts and was not at risk for eloping or wandering. Resident #1's record review revealed the following attempted and successful elopements after admission: On 9/4/24, a progress note revealed Resident #1 left the facility through the South Short Hall emergency exit and was verbally redirected inside. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF697Aug 24, 2023
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to manage severe intractable pain for one (#3) of 16 sample residents. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE] with severe pain from cancer that had metastasized to her bones. Resident #3's goal was rehabilitation therapy and strengthening so she could be discharged home with family. Resident #3 had severe pain and physician orders for regularly scheduled and as-needed (PRN) pain medications. However, the resident was only given one dose of PRN pain medication, her daily ordered pain patch was never administered during her stay at the facility, and Resident #3 continued to suffer excruciating pain rated at severe levels, of 8, 9, and 10 out of 10 on ,d+[DATE], ,d+[DATE], ,d+[DATE] and [DATE]. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Jan 26, 2023
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse, neglect and exploitation for seven (#32, #40, #49, #56, #57, #71 and #226) of nine residents reviewed for abuse out of 41 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #32 was free from physical harm and mental anguish. Resident #32 was hit repeatedly in the face by Resident #56 on 12/18/22, resulting in facial lacerations, swelling, and feelings of fearfulness and anxiety. Resident #56 continued to exhibit intimidating behaviors towards that resident in the days following the 12/18/22 altercation. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF692Jan 26, 2023
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate nutrition and hydration to one (#43) of eight residents reviewed out of 41 sample residents. Resident #43 received hospice services and was documented to have unavoidable weight loss. However, the facility failed to assess Resident #43's dietary and drink preferences, assess and implement dietary interventions, provide fortified foods as recommended by the registered dietitian, and provide food and drink access to ensure the resident received the assistance needed for his comfort, enjoyment and dignity, and to ensure he did not go hungry and thirsty. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF925Apr 29, 2025
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so the environment was free of pests. Specifically, the facility failed to prevent and take adequate measures to eliminate mice within the facility. Findings include: I. Professional references According to the State Board of Health Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations (revised 3/16/24) retrieved on 5/1/25, read in pertinent part, The premises shall be maintained free of insects, rodents, and other pests. […]
Read 34 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 34 of 250 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 9, 2026Standard10 findings
- Feb 5, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Aug 13, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Apr 29, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Nov 15, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jul 23, 2024Standard and complaint12 findings
- Nov 7, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Aug 24, 2023Complaint7 findings · 1 harm
Show the 37 earlier surveys
- Jul 27, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jan 26, 2023Standard and complaint15 findings · 2 harm
- Jul 19, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Dec 20, 2021Standard2 findings
- Feb 17, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Dec 2, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Oct 12, 2020Standard9 findings
- Feb 7, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Nov 20, 2019Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Apr 9, 2019Standard11 findings
- Jan 3, 2019Complaint3 findings
- Nov 7, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Sep 6, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Apr 5, 2018Standard and complaint13 findings
- Nov 15, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jun 1, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Apr 4, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Mar 10, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Jan 10, 2017Standard and complaint16 findings · 2 harm
- Oct 12, 2016Complaint6 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 10, 2015Standard and complaint6 findings
- Jul 29, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jun 17, 2015Complaint7 findings
- Feb 6, 2015Complaint7 findings
- Jan 13, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Oct 10, 2014Standard8 findings
- May 1, 2014Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
- Apr 3, 2014Standard and complaint3 findings
- Jan 27, 2014Standard and complaint25 findings
- Nov 20, 2013—3 findings
- Oct 16, 2013—3 findings
- Feb 25, 2013Standard9 findings
- Feb 22, 2013—9 findings
- Jun 18, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 12, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 15, 2011—20 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 15, 2010—14 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction