Deficiency Index

Holland Home - Raybrook Manor

Grand Rapids, Michigan · CCN 235440

29 surveys since 2010, 14 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
98
Surveys
29
Harm or worse
14
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file23/29

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
101
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Kent
Medicare-certified since
1985

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
2
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 112 facilities of 100–127 beds in Michigan.

Last survey on record

Jun 24, 2026

138 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.774.67
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.93—
Annual nurse turnover31.3%33.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ14.2%K—L—
Actual harmG14.2%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1666.7%E312.5%F28.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B14.2%C—
CMS’s current file: 24 of the 98 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6002×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Holland Home - Raybrook Manor, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Jun 24, 2026

    This citation pertains to intake #2808946.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care in accordance with professional standards in 3 residents (Resident #101, #103 & #106) of 6 residents reviewed for quality of care, resulting in an immediate jeopardy for 1 resident (Resident #101) when, beginning on 2/28/26 at approximately 8:00 AM, Resident #101 had an acute change of condition and staff failed to accurately assess, monitor and notify the physician, resulting in Resident #101 being transported to the hospital on 3/1/26 (approximately 24 hours later) due to unresponsiveness, hypertensive (high blood pressure) and fever. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 5, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to 1.) implement documented intervention and provide adequate supervision to prevent a fall for 1 (Resident #8) resident and 2.) safely transport 2 (Resident #27 and #42) residents in their wheelchairs with foot pedals of 5 residents reviewed for accidents/hazards/falls, resulting in a fall with fracture and a significant change in health status (Resident #8) and the potential for falls for Resident #27 and #42. Findings include: Resident #8 Review of an Admission Record revealed Resident #8 was a female, with pertinent diagnoses which included: fracture of nasal bones (1/23/25), other fracture of third [NAME] (lumbar) vertebra (1/23/25). […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 12, 2022

    This citation pertains to intake MI 022. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a gait belt was used during ambulation for 1 (Resident #6) of 4 residents reviewed for falls resulting in pain, hospitalization , and a subdural hematoma (bleed that occurs within your skull but outside the brain tissue) for Resident #6. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 8/10/22 at 9:30 AM, Resident #6 reported she fell last month, she hit her head, went to the hospital, and she had stitches in the right side of her head. Resident #6 stated the stitches came out a few days ago and reported it was painful when she fell . Resident #6 was observed seated upright in her recliner chair in her room watching television. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Sep 8, 2021

    This citation pertains to Intake: MI 345 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and implement appropriate care planned interventions to prevent a fall in 1 of 5 residents (Resident #102) reviewed for falls, resulting in a fall with laceration injury to the resident's head and Findings include: Review of Incident Summary dated 8/19/2021, revealed, .Resident had a fall during either a repositioning in bed or transfer out of bed in her room on 8-18-2021 at approximately 9:10pm. (Unit Manager G) discovered possible root cause, during post-fall review, may have been a one person transfer by the (CNA C), when the care guide indicates transfers with two assist. Investigation initiated and employee placed on administrative leave. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF583Feb 5, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1.) protect the residents right to privacy for 1 (Resident #50) of 1 resident reviewed for privacy when staff entered the resident's room without knocking or asking for permission, 2). maintain the confidentiality of the Protected Health Information (PHI) when the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) was left open and unattended in a common area of the facility, resulting in 1.) feelings of frustration and embarrassment (Resident #50) and 2.) potential for unauthorized access to unsecured resident protected health information. […]

Read 32 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 32 of 98 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 24, 2026Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 12, 2026Standard1 finding
  • Dec 23, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 5, 2025Standard9 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 26, 2024Standard6 findings
  • Nov 29, 2023Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 11, 2023Standard3 findings
  • Aug 12, 2022Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
Show the 21 earlier surveys
  • Sep 22, 2021Standard3 findings
  • Sep 8, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 23, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 6, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Sep 26, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jun 26, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 23, 2018Standard and complaint7 findings · 2 harm
  • Sep 14, 2017Standard14 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 3, 2016Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Dec 17, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 17, 2015Standard6 findings
  • Jun 5, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 21, 2015Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Aug 28, 2014Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Sep 9, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 16, 2013—2 findings
  • Apr 4, 2013—2 findings
  • Oct 12, 2012—3 findings
  • Apr 13, 2012—2 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 15, 2012—4 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 22, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction