Deficiency Index

Highland Court, A Rehabilitation and Resident Care

Marshall, Arkansas · CCN 045353

18 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
73
Surveys
18
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file15/18

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
78
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
SOUTHERN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
County
Searcy · rural
Medicare-certified since
1999

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 67 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Arkansas.

Last survey on record

Aug 7, 2025

459 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.933.83
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.73—
Annual nurse turnover38.8%46.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD425.0%E1062.5%F16.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C16.3%
CMS’s current file: 16 of the 73 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6952×

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5581×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F6411×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Highland Court, A Rehabilitation and Resident Care, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 21, 2023

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the freezer, and dry storage area were covered, sealed, and dated to minimize the potential for food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen, snack products were promptly removed and/or discarded on or before the expiration or use by date to prevent the growth of bacteria; leftover food items were used to maintain food quality for residents who received mechanical soft diets and pureed diets from 1 of 1 kitchen; dietary staff washed their hands between dirty and clean tasks and before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent the potential for cross contamination; and 1 of 1 ice scoop holder was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition to prevent… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 3, 2021

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure dietary staff washed their hands between dirty and clean tasks, the storage shelves were clean, food was labeled and dated after being opened, outdated food items were removed and discarded before the use by date, hair nets were worn in the kitchen area, clean utensils were allowed to dry before re-use and the can opener was clean to decrease the potential for food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. The findings are: 1. On [DATE] at 10:15 AM, on a shelf in the dry storage area, there were four bottles of ketchup with an expiration date of [DATE]. Dietary Employee #2, was asked, Should the expired bottles of ketchup be on the shelf in the dry storage? She stated, No. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Apr 25, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each Resident with respect and dignity, to promote or enhance their quality of life for 2 Residents (Residents #9 and #19) of 6 Residents who were seated at the dining assistive table in the main dining room. This had the potential to affect 5 residents who require assistance with meals, and who eat in the main dining room. Findings included: A review of an Admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #9 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease and abnormal weight loss. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF558Apr 25, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident ' s call devices were in reach for 2 (Residents #14 and #32) of 2 Residents with call devices not in reach. This had the potential to affect 23 residents residing on 300 hall. Findings include: A review of an Admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #14 with a diagnoses that included a history of falling, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, essential primary hypertension, diastolic congestive heart failure, and pain. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #14 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Apr 25, 2024

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to review and revise the Resident's care plan for 2 Residents (Residents #9 and #25) of 2 residents who was reviewed for care plan compliance. This had the potential to affect 57 residents who currently reside in the facility. The findings included: A review of an Admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #9 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease and abnormal weight loss. The discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #9, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/30/2023, revealed a Staff Assessment for Mental Status (SAMS) Cognitive Skills for Daily Decision-Making score of 3, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 73 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 7, 2025Standard1 finding
  • Apr 25, 2024Standard10 findings
  • Apr 21, 2023Standard5 findings
  • Dec 3, 2021Standard6 findings
  • Dec 10, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 12, 2020Standard2 findings
  • Jul 10, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 13, 2019Standard4 findings
Show the 10 earlier surveys
  • Aug 17, 2018Standard3 findings
  • May 5, 2017Standard6 findings
  • Apr 21, 2016Standard17 findings
  • May 15, 2015Standard1 finding
  • May 23, 2014Complaint5 findings
  • Apr 24, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Jul 12, 2013—2 findings
  • Sep 20, 2012—4 findings
  • Oct 20, 2011—2 findings
  • Mar 24, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction