Corning Therapy and Living Center
Corning, Arkansas · CCN 045433
18 surveys since 2011, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 70
- Surveys
- 18
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 4
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 84
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- ANTHONY & BRYAN ADAMS
- County
- Clay · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2010
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 67 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Arkansas.
Last survey on record
Dec 18, 2025
326 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.80 | 3.83 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.52 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 50.0% | 46.9% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,021 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J114.3% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D571.4% | E114.3% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Corning Therapy and Living Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Aug 8, 2024
50682 Based on record review, document review, observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to prevent an elopement, as evidenced by failure to ensure increased supervision was provided during periods of increased exit-seeking behaviors for 1 (Resident # 240) sampled resident. The failed practice resulted in past noncompliance at the level of immediate jeopardy (IJ), which caused, or could have caused serious harm, injury or death to Resident # 240 who was at high risk for elopement. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF679Aug 8, 2024
Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that activities were provided for all 42 residents that reside in the building. The findings included: On 8/5/24 at 2:33 PM, the Surveyor did not observe activities upon entry of the secure unit. On 8/6/24 at 8:57 AM, the Surveyor observed no activities occurring on the secure unit. On 8/6/24 at 10:08 AM, the Surveyor observed staff offering the residents a snack. No activities observed this morning on the secured unit. On 8/6/24 at 2:01 PM, the Surveyor observed no activities on the secure unit. On 8/7/24 at 8:52 AM, the Surveyor observed no activities on the secure unit. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF625Apr 28, 2022
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify resident representatives or Power of Attorneys (POA) in writing of the bed hold policy upon a resident's transfer to the hospital and/ or discharge as required for 2 (Resident #27 and #22) of 6 (Resident #27, #42, #41, #16, #38 and #22) sample residents who were transferred to the hospital in the last five months. The findings are: 1. Resident #27 had a diagnosis [CONDITION(S)] and [CONDITION(S)]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 1/17/2022 documented a score of 11 (8-12 indicates Moderately impaired) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). a. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF677Mar 12, 2021
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure facial hair was removed regularly to maintain good grooming for 2 (Residents #18 and #38) of 3 (Residents #3, #18, and #38) sampled residents who were dependent on staff for assistance with care and facial hair removal. This failed practice had the potential to affect 9 residents who were dependent on staff for assistance with care and facial hair removal and resided on the 100 Hall, according to a list provided by the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator on 3/11/2021. The findings are: 1. Resident #18 had [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF695Mar 12, 2021
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was consistently administered at the flow rate ordered by the physician, to minimize the potential for [MEDICAL CONDITION] or other respiratory complications for 1 (Resident #38) of 6 (Residents #38, #12, #31 #40, #44, and #51) sampled residents who were receiving oxygen therapy; and, the facility failed to ensure a Physician's Order was obtained for the administration of oxygen therapy for 1 (Resident #12) of 6 (Residents #12, #31 #38, #40, #44, and #51) sampled residents who had oxygen in use. These failed practices had the potential to affect 10 residents who were receiving oxygen therapy, according to a list provided by the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator on 3/11/2021. The findings are: 1. […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 70 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Dec 18, 2025Standard1 finding
- Aug 8, 2024Standard3 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 27, 2023Standard3 findings
- May 25, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Apr 28, 2022Standard and complaint5 findings
- Mar 12, 2021Standard and complaint9 findings
- Jun 26, 2020Complaint5 findings
- Aug 30, 2019Standard5 findings
Show the 10 earlier surveys
- Sep 13, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jul 14, 2017Standard1 finding
- Jun 24, 2016Standard6 findings
- Aug 7, 2015Standard7 findings
- Oct 9, 2014Standard5 findings
- Sep 27, 2013—5 findings
- Feb 15, 2013—3 findings · 2 harm
- Oct 11, 2012—3 findings
- May 10, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 18, 2011—6 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Summit Health & Rehab CenterTaylorno harm findings
- Atkins Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAtkinsno harm findings
- Gosnell Health and RehabGosnell1 harm finding
- Highland Court, A Rehabilitation and Resident CareMarshallno harm findings
- The Blossoms at Nashville Rehab and Nursing CenterNashvilleno harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction