Health Center at the Renaissance

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Health Center at the Renaissance, in the surveyor’s own words.

• Actual harm, isolatedF689Oct 6, 2025

  Based on medical record review, hospital record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized fall prevention program/fall interventions to decrease Resident #2's risk of falls including falls with injury. This affected one resident (#2) of one resident reviewed for falls. The facility census was 82.Actual Harm occurred on 12/09/24 when Resident #2, who was at risk for falls and had a history of falls, sustained a left hip fracture without evidence the facility had implemented individualized and effective interventions to prevent the fall with fracture. The resident had sustained falls on 11/29/24 and 12/08/24 with the only intervention listed post fall was to remind the resident to call for assistance. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF600Oct 6, 2025

  Based on resident record review, staff interviews, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), and review of facility concern logs, a soft file investigation and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Residents #33 and #48 were free from verbal and physical abuse. This affected two residents (#33 and #48) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 82.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 08/23/20 and diagnoses including dementia, hypertension, and major depressive disorder.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 had short- and long-term cognition impairment, was severely impaired regarding tasks of daily life, had a history of physical and verbally aggressive… […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Oct 6, 2025

  Based on resident record review, staff interviews, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), review of facility soft file investigation, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an incident of alleged abuse to the State Agency. This affected one (Resident #48) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 82.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 03/03/25 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, osteoarthritis of the left knee, and right artificial hip joint. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF677Oct 6, 2025

  Based on record review, observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide accommodation for a dependent resident's needs. This affected one (Resident #38) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 82. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 01/30/22 with diagnoses including dementia, major depressive disorder, and carpal tunnel syndrome of the right upper limb. Resident #38 received hospice care services. Review of the physician order dated 07/06/23 revealed an order for Resident #38 to reside in the memory support unit. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF759Oct 6, 2025

  Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were given according to physician's orders, creating a medication error rate of 16.0 percent (%). This affected two residents (#29 and #32) of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 82. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 09/08/25 and diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, ventricular tachycardia, and stage four chronic kidney disease. A physician's order dated 09/18/25 was for 12.5 milligrams (mg) of spironolactone (a diuretic) to be given daily, with no other current orders for this medication. […]