Deficiency Index

Haven of Phoenix

Phoenix, Arizona · CCN 035107

20 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2014.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
83
Surveys
20
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file14/20

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
114
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
HAVEN HEALTH
County
Maricopa
Medicare-certified since
1985

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 39 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Arizona.

Last survey on record

May 6, 2026

187 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.233.45
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.53—
Annual nurse turnover37.4%45.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$8,278 across 1 penalty
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG15.0%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1470.0%E525.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 20 of the 83 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6002×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6582×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6101×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Haven of Phoenix, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Dec 16, 2025

    Based on documentation, staff and resident interviews, and review of the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure the safety of one resident (#5) by not properly securing the resident and failing to maintain a safe speed during transport. The deficient practice could result in residents being physically injured.Findings include:Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on December 28, 2023, with a diagnosis including infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal left knee prosthesis, subsequent encounter, hypertensive chronic kidney disease with stage 5 chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease, and dependence on renal dialysis.Review of the Care Plan, date-initiated December 18, 2023, revealed a focus for fall risk related to… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF600May 6, 2026

    Based on a review of records, observation, interviews, policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that two residents (#122 and #163) were not abused by another resident (#121 and #60) out of 11 sampled residents. The Universe was 99. The deficient practice could lead to physical and psychosocial harm to residents.Regarding the altercation between Resident #121 and Resident #122-Regarding #121, (Alleged Perpetrator) Resident #121 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included encephalopathy, anxiety, and bipolar disorder.A Physical Aggression incident report dated April 27, 2026, at 5:35 p.m., revealed that a Nurse was notified of an incident involving Resident #121 (alleged perpetrator) and #122 (alleged victim), who shared a room. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684May 6, 2026

    Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered as ordered for two of five sampled residents (Resident #32 and #56). The deficient practice could result in resident's pain not being controlled.Regarding Resident #32: Resident #32 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type; bipolar disorder; major depressive disorder; and anxiety disorder. A care plan focus dated February 24, 2025, revealed Resident #32 had polyneuropathy pain. Interventions included that the staff were to anticipate his need for pain relief and respond as soon as possible. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880May 6, 2026

    Based on observation, review of the clinical records, staff interviews, review of the Blood Glucose Monitoring System User's Guide, and review of the facility's policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that staff conducted proper hand sanitizing during a meal service and infection control procedures were performed after a point of care testing for blood sugar check, for one resident (#164) to help prevent a transmission of infections according to acceptable clinical standards of practice. The census was 99. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF680Jan 24, 2025

    Based on personnel file review, staff interviews, and facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional. This deficient practice could have resulted in the activities provided not meeting the assessed needs of the residents. Findings Include: A review of the personnel file for the role of activity manager (AD/Staff #111) was conducted on May 21, 2024. However, the review did not reveal evidence that staff #111 possessed the qualifications required for the role of activities director. An interview was conducted on January 23, 2025, at 9:38 A.M. with staff #111, Activities Director. Staff #111 stated that she had been working at the facility as an Activities Director for several years. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 83 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 6, 2026Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Dec 16, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 24, 2025Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Sep 13, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 20, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 8, 2023Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Jul 28, 2022Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Dec 1, 2020Infection control1 finding
Show the 12 earlier surveys
  • Jun 12, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 12, 2020Standard5 findings
  • Jan 16, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Sep 13, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 21, 2016Standard2 findings
  • Jun 11, 2015Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Feb 13, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 4, 2014Standard and complaint10 findings · 2 harm
  • Aug 2, 2013—7 findings
  • Feb 28, 2013—3 findings
  • Dec 2, 2011—4 findings
  • Oct 4, 2010—13 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction