Deficiency Index

Hale Malamalama

Honolulu, Hawaii · CCN 125050

14 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2023.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
130
Surveys
14
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse3

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file10/14

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
40
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Honolulu
Medicare-certified since
1999

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
1
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 25 for-profit facilities in Hawaii.

Last survey on record

Jan 31, 2025

647 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.184.18
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.40—
Annual nurse turnover51.2%38.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$72,144 across 1 penalty
Special focus
SFF Candidate

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG37.0%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2251.2%E818.6%F1023.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 43 of the 130 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5843×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6573×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F8352×

    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Hale Malamalama, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Jan 31, 2025

    Based on interview, record and document review, the facility failed to protect one resident (R)1 of two investigated for staff abuse/neglect. Specifically, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA)2 was witnessed to make inappropriate, unsympathetic comments to R1, and willfully neglected to provide her the necessary services of toileting on more than one occasion. As a result of these willful acts, R1 suffered mental anguish and emotional harm. Findings include: 1) On 01/10/2025, the Office of Healthcare Assurance (OHCA) received an anonymous report of potential abuse of R1 (alleged victim/AV) by facility staff. The narrative account included but not limited to: - R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for skilled nursing level of care after being hospitalized . […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Sep 15, 2023

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide care to residents in accordance with professional standards of practice. Resident (R)89 is allergic to iodine (disinfectant) and the facility did not identify and provide a substitute for iodine. The staff member used alcohol pads to cleanse the area before inserting a catheter. This deficient practice had the potential to cause burning of the skin or pain. Finding includes: R89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admitting diagnoses of rectal pain/anal fissure (tear in the thin, moist tissue that lines the anus) and unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance. Record review found a progress note dated, 09/15/23 at 01:37 AM. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Sep 15, 2023

    Based on record review (RR), interview with family and staff, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents sampled were free from accidents. Resident (R) 7 had two avoidable falls. The facility failed to perform a root cause analysis and based on identification of probably contributing factors, develop interventions to prevent falls. The facility also implemented interventions that were not included in the resident's care plan. Findings include: Cross Reference to F657. Care Plan Timing and Revision. On 09/12/23 at 10:47 AM while introducing self to R7, who was resting sitting upright in his bed, observed he had multiple bruises and swelling to his face. When asked how he got the bruises on his face he reported I fell . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF867Sep 27, 2024

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to create an annual Performance Improvement Project (PIP) that focuses on high risk or problem prone areas identified through the data collection and analysis. This deficient practice has the potential to negatively affect all the residents' overall wellbeing. Findings Include: Interview and facility document review were concurrently conducted on 09/27/24 at 10:33 AM with the facility Administrator. The facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) binders did not contain documents on an annual Performance Improvement Project (PIP). Administrator confirmed that the committee met quarterly to discuss current facility issues and improvements but did not have an official PIP. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF563Sep 15, 2023

    Based on complaint report and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents of the facility had the right to receive visitors. Findings include: On 11/28/22, the Office of Health Care Assurance (OHCA) received a complaint alleging the facility was not allowing visitors due to identification of COVID-19 cases. The complainant provided photos of signage in the window which read, Please No Visitors At this time. Thank you. There was also a stand with a posted sign, COVID-19 cases have been identified in the facility. No visitors are allowed at this time until further notice. On 09/14/23 at 01:00 PM an interview was conducted with the Infection Control Coordinator (ICC). ICC reported the facility had a COVID-19 outbreak at the end of last year. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 130 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 31, 2025Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 27, 2024Standard6 findings
  • Sep 15, 2023Standard and complaint23 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 6, 2022Standard9 findings
  • Jun 4, 2021Standard21 findings
  • Jul 1, 2019Standard9 findings
  • Jul 20, 2018Standard9 findings
  • May 19, 2017Standard9 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
  • Apr 28, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Jun 16, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • May 1, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Nov 22, 2013—10 findings
  • Aug 14, 2012—14 findings
  • Nov 5, 2010—5 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction