Deficiency Index

Greenfield Care Center of Fullerton, LLC

Fullerton, California · CCN 056151

19 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
118
Surveys
19
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file15/19

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
99
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
EVA CARE GROUP
County
Orange
Medicare-certified since
1989

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Apr 2, 2026

221 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.214.16
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.77—
Annual nurse turnover21.5%37.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2273.3%E413.3%F13.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B310.0%C—
CMS’s current file: 30 of the 118 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6862×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

  • F7552×

    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

  • F7592×

    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Greenfield Care Center of Fullerton, LLC, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Oct 29, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility P&P review, and facility document review, the facility failed to maintain the infection control practices to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections. * The facility failed to show documentation of the Legionella (a bacteria that can cause a serious type of lung infection) facility risk assessment and Legionella testing protocols. * The facility failed to ensure the trash bin and laundry hamper were available for used gloves and used washable gowns in Resident 39's room, who was on isolation precautions. * LVN 3 failed to perform hand hygiene while providing wound care to Resident 26. * LVN s 5 and 6 failed to perform hand hygiene during medication administration. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Apr 2, 2026

    Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services to maintain the highest practicable well-being for three of three sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 1, 2, and 3's change of conditions was monitored every shift for at least 72 hours. These failures had the potential to negatively affect the residents' health and well-being and risk of not providing the residents with appropriate and individualized care.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Change of Condition dated 4/2025 showed the following:- Licensed nurses will contact the primary physician (alternate physician or Medical Director) of resident status as soon as possible when there is a… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Sep 6, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine was cleaned and sanitized according to the manufacturer's instructions. This failure posed the risk of the residents contracting the illnesses from the ice served to them. Findings: Review of the facility matrix showed 93 of 93 residents residing in the facility received food prepared in the kitchen. On 9/3/24 at 0951 hours, a concurrent observation, interview, and facility document review was conducted with the Maintenance Director. The facility was equipped with one ice machine. When asked about cleaning and sanitizing the ice machine, the Maintenance Director showed an inner panel on the ice machine containing the instructions on how to clean and sanitize. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Sep 6, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to maintain the infection control practices to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections. * The facility failed to plan and implement the control measures to prevent the growth of the Legionella (a bacteria that can cause a serious type of lung infection) in the facility's water system. * The facility failed to ensure LVN 2 performed hand hygiene in between glove change while providing wound care to Resident 486. These failures had the potential for the spread of infection in the facility. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Oct 29, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the food safety and sanitation requirements were met in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure labeling and dating of foods in the refrigerator and open storage area used for resident food. * The facility failed to air dry equipment. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen utensils had a smooth cleanable surface. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses in a medically vulnerable resident population who consumed food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the form CMS-672 Resident Census and Conditions of Residents completed by the facility dated 11/2/21, showed 90 of 92 residents residing in the facility received food prepared in the kitchen. 1. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 118 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 2, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 11, 2025Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Sep 6, 2024Standard and complaint11 findings
  • Jan 11, 2023Infection control2 findings
  • Oct 29, 2021Standard6 findings
  • Mar 2, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 14, 2020Standard5 findings
  • Jan 14, 2019Standard7 findings
Show the 11 earlier surveys
  • Jan 10, 2018Standard12 findings
  • Jun 22, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 9, 2017Standard8 findings
  • Feb 1, 2016Standard9 findings
  • Dec 4, 2014Standard9 findings
  • Sep 25, 2013—10 findings
  • Sep 26, 2012—7 findings
  • Jul 6, 2012—2 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 27, 2011—1 finding
  • Aug 11, 2011—3 findings
  • Jun 24, 2011Standard11 findings · 2 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction