Deficiency Index

Green Country Care Center

Tulsa, Oklahoma · CCN 375421

19 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
109
Surveys
19
Harm or worse
8
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file14/19

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
114
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
PHOENIX HEALTHCARE
County
Tulsa
Medicare-certified since
2003

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 94 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Oklahoma.

Last survey on record

Mar 20, 2026

234 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.693.68
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.11—
Annual nurse turnover33.3%54.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$8,281 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ13.7%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2074.1%E622.2%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 27 of the 109 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5783×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F6372×

    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Green Country Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Mar 20, 2026

    A past noncompliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist effective 03/10/26 at 4:00 a.m. related to the facility's failure to ensure a resident with moderately impaired cognition and history of elopement did not elope unnoticed from the facility.On 03/19/26, the Oklahoma State Department of Health verified the existence of the past noncompliance IJ related to the facility's failure to prevent a resident's elopement.The past noncompliance IJ was removed effective 03/10/26 at 1:30 p.m., when the facility had put the following measures in place to prevent recurrence.a. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF574Nov 15, 2024

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide access to notifications of resident rights, ombudsman contact information, and state agency contact information. The administrator identified 76 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 11/13/24 at 10:41 a.m., the five residents who attended the resident council meeting stated they did not know where to find the phone number to contact the ombudsman, did not know where the resident rights were posted, or how to contact OSDH to register a complaint or concern. Immediately following the resident council meeting, the notices were observed to be posted in the locked vestibule by the facility front door, and inside the nurses' station along the far wall. The locked vestibule was not accessible by the residents. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF578Nov 15, 2024

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide information to formulate an advance directive for three (#22, 66, and #71) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for advance directives. The administrator identified 75 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: The Advance Directives policy, dated December 2016, read in part, Upon admission, the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right .to formulate an advance directive if he or she chooses to do so .the information may be provided to the resident's legal representative .The Interdisciplinary Team will review annually with the resident his or her advance directives to ensure that such directives are still the wishes of the resident. 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Sep 28, 2023

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident dignity related to: a. Res #50 was not disrobe and/or expose themselves in front of other residents and staff in the dining room and on the unit; b. the residents on the locked unit had on proper foot-wear when in the dining room and on the unit; and c. staff did not stand while assisting residents to eat. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents form documented 79 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #50 had diagnoses which included frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder and dementia. An annual assessment, dated 08/17/23, documented the resident was severely impaired with cognition and required limited to extensive assistance with ADLs. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF692Sep 28, 2023

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to act upon a dietitian recommendation timely for one (#50) of four sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 79 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #50 had diagnoses which included other specified eating disorder, diabetes mellitus, and dementia. The EHR documented,on 02/01/22, the resident's weight was 221.8 lbs. A dietitian note, dated 05/28/23, documented the resident's weight was 183.2 pounds. The note documented the resident's weight was down 7.8% in two months and down 14.6% in four months. The resident weight was trending down but their BMI was 32.4. The note documented the resident chews on non-edible items frequently and wanders frequently. […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 109 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 20, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 26, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 15, 2024Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Sep 28, 2023Standard12 findings
  • Sep 2, 2022Standard5 findings
  • Aug 6, 2019Standard14 findings · 4 harm
  • Mar 25, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 25, 2018Standard7 findings · 2 harm
Show the 11 earlier surveys
  • Jun 14, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 24, 2017Standard10 findings
  • Feb 1, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 18, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 17, 2015Standard5 findings
  • Oct 29, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 25, 2014Standard15 findings
  • Aug 9, 2013—11 findings
  • Jun 15, 2012—5 findings
  • Apr 18, 2012—3 findings
  • Jul 14, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction