Deficiency Index

Grande Oaks

Oakwood Village, Ohio · CCN 365825

58 surveys since 2011, 12 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
237
Surveys
58
Harm or worse
12
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file45/58

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
60
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
EMBASSY HEALTHCARE
County
Cuyahoga
Medicare-certified since
1991

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
1
Staffing
1
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 188 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Ohio.

Last survey on record

Apr 29, 2026

194 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.613.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.30—
Annual nurse turnover68.1%46.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$17,020 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ11.1%K—L—
Actual harmG44.4%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD6066.7%E910.0%F1516.7%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C11.1%
CMS’s current file: 90 of the 237 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F9216×

    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.

  • F6845×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F8805×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F7604×

    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.

  • F8424×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Grande Oaks, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF686Sep 9, 2022

    Based on observation, medical record review, review of the facility's policy and procedure for skin management, interviews with nursing staff, family interview, and Wound Physician #123 interview, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive and effective pressure ulcer treatment program for two residents (Residents #42 and #18). This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy that was actual harm on 08/01/22 when the facility failed to ensure Resident #18's wound care physician orders were transcribed and treatments implemented, skin assessments completed, and pressure relieving interventions were active and functional resulting in the development of pressure ulcers and the declining condition of the existing pressure ulcers to a Stage 4 pressure ulcer and an Unstageable pressure ulcer. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Apr 29, 2026

    Based on record review, observations, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident with a new right leg injury received timely and thorough assessment, monitoring, treatment, and physician notification following a fall related injury. This resulted in the worsening of the untreated right leg condition, which progressed to an open necrotic wound requiring hospitalization, surgical debridement, and treatment for sepsis. This affected one (Resident #18) of four residents reviewed for hospitalization. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF692Apr 29, 2026

    Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health and facility failed to monitor and implement interventions to maintain proper nutritional health. This affected two (Residents #18 and #46) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 42.Actual harm occurred on 10/31/25 when Resident #46 was transferred to the hospital for treatment of severe dehydration related complications due to the facility's failure to adequately monitor and assess his hydration status, failure to ensure tube feeding and flush orders were written correctly and implemented as intended, and failure to respond appropriately to his documented change in condition.Findings include:1. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Dec 2, 2024

    THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, interviews, review of hospital records, review of witness statements and wound policy, the facility failed to implement an adequate and effective pressure ulcer prevention program to promote healing and to ensure Resident #154, who was cognitively impaired, dependent on staff for activity of daily living care and incontinent of bowel, received left lateral ankle and foot wound treatments timely when dressings had become saturated with fecal material. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Sep 9, 2022

    Based on interview, record review, observation and policy review, the facility failed to provide wound dressing changes and skin observations as ordered. This affected two of 12 residents with wounds, Residents #21 and Resident #105. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #21 when she developed [CONDITION(S)] requiring antibiotic therapy. The facility also failed to ensure neurological (neuro) checks were completed post-fall. This affected one resident (Resident #20) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 54. Findings include: 1. Resident #21 was admitted to this facility on 01/28/17 with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

Read 30 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 30 of 237 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 29, 2026Standard and complaint25 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 28, 2025Complaint7 findings
  • Mar 27, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Dec 2, 2024Complaint16 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 18, 2024Complaint6 findings
  • Sep 11, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 11, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • May 20, 2024Complaint3 findings
Show the 50 earlier surveys
  • Mar 21, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 7, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 18, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 6, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • May 17, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 8, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 9, 2022Standard and complaint21 findings · 2 harm
  • Aug 2, 2022Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 18, 2022Complaint8 findings
  • Mar 11, 2022Complaint3 findings
  • Feb 3, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 22, 2021Complaint3 findings
  • Sep 27, 2021Complaint4 findings
  • Sep 16, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 16, 2021Complaint6 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 25, 2021Infection control3 findings
  • Dec 22, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 15, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jul 28, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 16, 2020Complaint4 findings
  • Sep 9, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 22, 2019Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Apr 17, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 10, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 14, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 9, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 29, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 26, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 8, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 2, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 28, 2017Standard8 findings
  • Jun 8, 2017Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 3, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 23, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 14, 2016Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 1, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Feb 18, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 12, 2015Complaint5 findings
  • Mar 26, 2015Complaint7 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 24, 2014Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 4, 2014Standard3 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 13, 2014Complaint3 findings
  • Jun 11, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 6, 2014Complaint4 findings
  • Aug 16, 2013—13 findings
  • May 17, 2012—14 findings
  • Nov 29, 2011—1 finding
  • Nov 3, 2011—2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 20, 2011—1 finding
  • Mar 17, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction