Deficiency Index

Good Shepherd Health Center

Mason City, Iowa · CCN 165072

32 surveys since 2011, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
111
Surveys
32
Harm or worse
9
Immediate jeopardy
4
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy4

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file24/32

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
170
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Cerro Gordo · rural
Medicare-certified since
1968

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
1

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 168 not-for-profit facilities in Iowa.

Last survey on record

Feb 24, 2026

258 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.653.85
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.36—
Annual nurse turnover68.7%38.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$87,458 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ13.6%K—L—
Actual harmG13.6%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2175.0%E310.7%F27.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 28 of the 111 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6844×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6402×

    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.

  • F5521×

    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Good Shepherd Health Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF689Feb 3, 2021

    Based on observation, clinical record review, staff and senior center staff interview, facility video footage review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained a safe and secure environment for 1 of 4 residents reviewed who were at an elopement risk, (Resident #1) which resulted in immediate jeopardy to resident health and safety. On 1/14/21 at 11:22 am Resident #1 left through door 4 on the 2nd floor, went down 2 flights of cement stairs and left the building out of door 1 on the 1st floor. The door alarm on the 2nd floor did not sound as it was shut off. The door alarm on the 1st floor sounded but the alarm panel showed door 3. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Aug 30, 2024

    Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, family, physician, emergency medical personnel, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement interventions in a timely manner for a resident following a fall for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #3). The facility failed to intervene after Resident #3 fell and complained instantly of new pain to his ribs. Despite, the family's frequent questioning about Resident #3's situation, the facility failed to send him to the hospital for 2 hours and 36 minutes following his fall. The facility's policy requires someone from nursing management to assess a resident following an incident. It took the nursing supervisor approximately 1 hours after Resident #3 fell for the nursing supervisor assessed Resident #3. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF713Mar 13, 2025

    Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy/procedure review at the time of the investigation, the facility failed to intervene timely for a resident who needed had a change in condition following a fall on 2/3/25 for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #2). At Resident #2's admission in December 2024, he came to the facility with a repaired fractured right hip due to a fall at home. Due to his cognition, he frequently forgot he previously had a hip fracture and would frequently transfer by himself. On 2/3/25, he had an unwitnessed fall. When the nurse assessed him, he reported pain to his right hip. After the nurse's assessment, 2 Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) assisted Resident #2 from the floor and back into bed. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 21, 2023

    Based on observation, clinical record review, staff, physician and family interview, the facility failed to protect a resident against burn hazards from the heating elements in their rooms by placing a residents bed parallel to the heater in their room for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #3). On 1/26/23 Resident #3 rolled out of low bed and was found by staff with body on top of the heater with the skin of the right ear, neck and upper thigh touching the heater. The facility identified a census of 159 residents. Findings include: A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment form dated 11/30/22 indicated Resident #3 had diagnoses that included Non-traumatic brain dysfunction, Non-Alzheimer Dementia, cataracts, glaucoma, muscle weakness and age-related physical debility. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF732Jul 6, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to post daily staffing in a clear and readable format and in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. The facility also failed to include the daily census on the posting. Findings include: Observation and interview on 7/5/23 at 2:52 PM revealed that the Scheduler (SCHR) had to show the surveyor where the Daily Staffing Report was located. The location was in the main lobby on a side hallway bulletin board that was completely filled. The SCHR stated, This could easily be missed depending on which hall you were going to, and it was not posted on the second floor. I am not informed of the daily census, and I have never put that on the report. […]

Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 111 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Feb 24, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 11, 2025Standard5 findings
  • Mar 13, 2025Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 31, 2024Standard7 findings
  • Sep 6, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 30, 2024Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 20, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 6, 2023Standard6 findings
Show the 24 earlier surveys
  • Feb 21, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jun 2, 2022Standard10 findings
  • Apr 14, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 3, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 19, 2019Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Nov 1, 2018Standard7 findings
  • Feb 16, 2018Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 17, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Jun 20, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • May 1, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 4, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 21, 2016Standard10 findings · 1 harm
  • May 26, 2016Complaint10 findings
  • Sep 3, 2015Standard6 findings
  • Feb 17, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 3, 2014Standard and complaint6 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 30, 2014—1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 2, 2013—1 finding
  • Feb 1, 2013—1 finding
  • Oct 31, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 21, 2012—1 finding
  • Apr 20, 2012—6 findings
  • Mar 15, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 4, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction