Friendship Haven, Inc
Fort Dodge, Iowa · CCN 165291
24 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 64
- Surveys
- 24
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 155
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Webster · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1996
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 168 not-for-profit facilities in Iowa.
Last survey on record
Jan 21, 2026
292 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.41 | 3.85 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.83 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 40.1% | 38.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D16100.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6092×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6102×
Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6001×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6281×
Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Friendship Haven, Inc, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jun 24, 2021
Based on observation, record and facility policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent elopement for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #1) identified by the facility at high risk for elopement. Resident #1, who was cognitively impaired, exited the facility unsupervised and without staff knowledge for 46 minutes in his wheelchair with weather temperature 88 degrees. The facility reported a census of 111 residents. 1. Resident #1 had an Admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], that documented diagnoses that included: hypertension, arthritis, anxiety, [CONDITION(S)] and [CONDITION(S)]. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689May 18, 2023
Based on clinical record review, interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure one (1) of four (4) residents received adequate supervision to protect against hazards in the environment (Resident #3). The facility's staff failed to implement safety measures to prevent a fall by not locking the resident's wheelchair brakes and not using a gait belt when transferring a resident. The record review and staff interviews revealed that Resident #3 required assistance with the use of a gait belt for transfers and ambulation. On 1/30/23, one staff member (Staff A, Certified Nurse Aide CNA) assisted Resident #3 to transfer without a gait belt. As Resident #3 went to sit in the wheelchair, it had one unlocked brake causing the wheelchair to move. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Apr 26, 2021
Based on observation, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control as indicated by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) regarding the use of personal protective equipment for four staff members observed. The facility reported a census of 103 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #96 showed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Aug 20, 2026
Based on record review, observation, policy review and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure staff appropriately and safely transported a resident in a wheelchair with the resident's feet on the wheelchair foot pedals for two of seven residents that required use of a wheelchair for transport (Resident #26 and Resident #109). The facility reported a census of 110 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had diagnoses of dementia and muscle weakness. The resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS indicated the resident used a wheelchair and required partial to moderate assistance for wheeling at least 150 feet in a corridor or similar space. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF759Aug 20, 2026
Based on record review, observations, staff interviews, policy review and manufacturer's instructions the facility failed to assure a medication error rate of less than 5%. During observations of medication administration, the facility had 2 errors out of 31 opportunities resulting in an error rate of 6.45 % (Residents #113 and #124). The facility reported a census of 110 residents.Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #113 had diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes (a chronic condition where the body resists or cannot use insulin well or does not make enough insulin). […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 64 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 20, 2026Standard5 findings
- Jan 21, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Sep 10, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Jul 3, 2025Standard3 findings
- Dec 31, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Nov 21, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Aug 8, 2024Standard and complaint3 findings
- Jan 25, 2024Standard and complaint4 findings
Show the 16 earlier surveys
- May 18, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 15, 2022Standard1 finding
- Jun 24, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 26, 2021Standard and complaint9 findings
- Nov 12, 2020Infection control2 findings
- Jun 9, 2020Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 7, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jul 11, 2019Standard10 findings
- Aug 16, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Mar 29, 2018Standard2 findings
- Feb 2, 2017Standard1 finding
- Feb 11, 2016Standard2 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 26, 2015Standard and complaint3 findings
- Nov 7, 2013—3 findings
- Nov 4, 2011—2 findings
- Oct 18, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction