Deficiency Index

Good Samaritan - Waukon

Waukon, Iowa · CCN 165240

16 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2025.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
45
Surveys
16
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/16

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
60
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY
County
Allamakee · rural
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
4
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 102 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Iowa.

Last survey on record

Apr 30, 2026

193 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.173.76
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.89—
Annual nurse turnover43.5%40.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$8,281 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ16.3%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1168.8%E318.8%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B16.3%C—
CMS’s current file: 16 of the 45 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Good Samaritan - Waukon, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Sep 11, 2025

    Based on observation, document review, and staff interview, the facility's administrative staff failed to ensure the staff secured all locked exit doors, resulting in 1 of 3 reviewed residents (Resident #1) at risk for elopement exiting the facility without the nursing staff's knowledge. Due to the facility staff's failures, Resident #1 eloped from the building through the maintenance office door without the nursing staff's knowledge and was missing for approximately 45 minutes before the nursing staff realized Resident #1 was missing by locating Resident #1 laying outside on the ground. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 20, 2026

    Based on clinical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to follow the care planned transfer technique for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for transfers (Resident #1). The failure to follow the care plan resulted in a fractured humerus (upper arm) for Resident #1, complaints of pain, and bruising. The facility further failed to provide adequate supervision to a resident known to wander and exit seek for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for supervision (Resident #3). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF802Apr 30, 2026

    Based on observation, dishwasher instructional manual, document review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff were competent in procedures to test and document the hot water sanitation of the dishwasher. The facility identified a census of 57 residents.Findings include:A Vendor Service Ticket dated 10/1/25 documented the installation of a new high temperature dishwasher.Observation on 4/27/26 at 1:26 PM revealed a hot water sanitation dishwasher. The dishwasher placard located on the right upper side of the dishwasher documented a required wash temperature of 150 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and a final rinse temperature of 180 degrees (F). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Apr 30, 2026

    Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to prevent bare hands from contacting food during food preparation and keep cold foods below 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) during meal service. The facility reported a census of 57 residents.Findings include:Observation on 4/28/26 at 10:26 AM Staff D, Lead [NAME] opened a plastic package of buns with her bare hands and proceeded to remove three buns from the bag and place the buns into a blender as she prepared a pureed taco burger for Resident #10. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF868Apr 16, 2025

    Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to maintain a quality assessment and assurance committee consisting at a minimum the Director of Nursing (DON), the Medical Director or his/her designee; at least three other members of the facility's staff, at least one of who must be the administrator, owner, a board member or other individual in a leadership role; and the Infection Preventionist (IP) were all in attendance for the first quarter of 2025 Quality Assurance (QA) meeting. The facility reported a census of 51 residents. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 45 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 20, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 30, 2026Standard8 findings
  • Sep 11, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 16, 2025Standard4 findings
  • Jan 30, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 11, 2024Standard2 findings
  • May 11, 2023Standard2 findings
  • Jan 6, 2022Standard2 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
  • Jan 9, 2020Standard3 findings
  • Dec 13, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Aug 24, 2017Standard6 findings
  • Jul 28, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Sep 17, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Jun 2, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • May 30, 2013—3 findings
  • Apr 29, 2011—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction