Good Samaritan - Waukon
Waukon, Iowa · CCN 165240
16 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2025.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 45
- Surveys
- 16
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 60
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY
- County
- Allamakee · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1994
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 102 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Iowa.
Last survey on record
Apr 30, 2026
193 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.17 | 3.76 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.89 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 43.5% | 40.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,281 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J16.3% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1168.8% | E318.8% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B16.3% | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Good Samaritan - Waukon, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Sep 11, 2025
Based on observation, document review, and staff interview, the facility's administrative staff failed to ensure the staff secured all locked exit doors, resulting in 1 of 3 reviewed residents (Resident #1) at risk for elopement exiting the facility without the nursing staff's knowledge. Due to the facility staff's failures, Resident #1 eloped from the building through the maintenance office door without the nursing staff's knowledge and was missing for approximately 45 minutes before the nursing staff realized Resident #1 was missing by locating Resident #1 laying outside on the ground. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 20, 2026
Based on clinical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to follow the care planned transfer technique for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for transfers (Resident #1). The failure to follow the care plan resulted in a fractured humerus (upper arm) for Resident #1, complaints of pain, and bruising. The facility further failed to provide adequate supervision to a resident known to wander and exit seek for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for supervision (Resident #3). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF802Apr 30, 2026
Based on observation, dishwasher instructional manual, document review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff were competent in procedures to test and document the hot water sanitation of the dishwasher. The facility identified a census of 57 residents.Findings include:A Vendor Service Ticket dated 10/1/25 documented the installation of a new high temperature dishwasher.Observation on 4/27/26 at 1:26 PM revealed a hot water sanitation dishwasher. The dishwasher placard located on the right upper side of the dishwasher documented a required wash temperature of 150 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and a final rinse temperature of 180 degrees (F). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Apr 30, 2026
Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to prevent bare hands from contacting food during food preparation and keep cold foods below 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) during meal service. The facility reported a census of 57 residents.Findings include:Observation on 4/28/26 at 10:26 AM Staff D, Lead [NAME] opened a plastic package of buns with her bare hands and proceeded to remove three buns from the bag and place the buns into a blender as she prepared a pureed taco burger for Resident #10. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF868Apr 16, 2025
Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to maintain a quality assessment and assurance committee consisting at a minimum the Director of Nursing (DON), the Medical Director or his/her designee; at least three other members of the facility's staff, at least one of who must be the administrator, owner, a board member or other individual in a leadership role; and the Infection Preventionist (IP) were all in attendance for the first quarter of 2025 Quality Assurance (QA) meeting. The facility reported a census of 51 residents. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 45 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 20, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 30, 2026Standard8 findings
- Sep 11, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 16, 2025Standard4 findings
- Jan 30, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jul 11, 2024Standard2 findings
- May 11, 2023Standard2 findings
- Jan 6, 2022Standard2 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
- Jan 9, 2020Standard3 findings
- Dec 13, 2018Standard3 findings
- Aug 24, 2017Standard6 findings
- Jul 28, 2016Standard1 finding
- Sep 17, 2015Standard4 findings
- Jun 2, 2015Complaint1 finding
- May 30, 2013—3 findings
- Apr 29, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction