Deficiency Index

Faith Lutheran Home

Osage, Iowa · CCN 165433

12 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2021.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
34
Surveys
12
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/12

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
50
Ownership
Non profit - Church related
Chain
Independent
County
Mitchell · rural
Medicare-certified since
2002

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=13, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jul 16, 2025

481 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.063.76
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.68—
Annual nurse turnover56.1%40.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD150.0%E150.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 2 of the 34 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Faith Lutheran Home, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF700Jun 17, 2021

    Based on observations, staff interviews, clinical record review, policy review, and the United States Food & Drug Administration's Guide, the facility failed to assess for initial medical need and risk of entrapment of bed rails for 4 of 14 residents (#17, #27, #28, #36) and maintain ongoing bed rail evaluations for 14 of 14 residents (#8, #13, #17, #18, #19,#20, #24, #25, #27, #28, #29, #30, #32, #36); obtain consent with education of possible risk of entrapment for 6 of 14 residents (#8, #17, #18, #20, #27, #36), and the entrapment of a resident (#27) between the side rail and mattress, all of which resulted in an immediate jeopardy and could lead to serious injury, impairment, or death. The facility reported a census of residents 33. Findings include: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF805Jul 16, 2025

    Based on observation, document review, menu review, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to properly prepare pureed food to ensure each resident received the appropriate serving size and nutrients for 7 of 7 residents sampled (Residents #2, #4, #7, #17, #19, #20, and #37). The facility reported a census of 39 residents.Findings include:On 7/14/25 the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) provided an untitled document with a list of residents who received a pureed diet. The list included Residents #2, #4, #7, #17, #19, #20 and #37.A Week 2, Tuesday Noon Meal Puree Menu documented the following:a. Beef cube pepper steak pureed serving #8 scoop (4 ounces (oz))b. French onion rice, #8 scoopc. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jun 17, 2021

    Based on review of infection prevention policies and procedures, staff interviews, observations, and review of hand washing policy, the facility failed to maintain infection prevention policy containing documents for transmission based precautions, antibiotic stewardship and other facility policy and procedures. During a dining observation staff failed to wash their hands appropriately. At the time of the survey, the facility reported a census of 33 residents. Resource: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021, January 8). Healthcare Providers. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/handhygiene/providers/index.html. Findings include: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF812Jul 16, 2025

    Based on observation, policy review, 2022 United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, consulting Dietitian and staff interviews, the facility failed to prevent soiled gloves from coming into contact with food during the food preparation for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #14, #23, #34 and #39). The facility reported a census of 39 residents.Findings include: On 7/15/25 observed the following during the kitchen service:At 11:28 AM without completing hand hygiene, Staff A, Cook, placed the blade into the food processor with her bare right hand, she used to touch multiple other surfaces prior to touching the food processor blade. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF688Jan 12, 2023

    Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide the therapy recommended restorative program to prevent potential decline for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #14 and #30) sampled. The facility identified a census of 42 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #14 with a long/short term memory impairment and severely impaired decision making ability. The Resident required total assistance with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 34 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 16, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Jan 12, 2023Standard3 findings
  • Jun 17, 2021Standard8 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 28, 2020Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 11, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Apr 5, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Jan 28, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Dec 18, 2014Standard2 findings
Show the 4 earlier surveys
  • Oct 17, 2013—3 findings
  • Apr 25, 2013—1 finding
  • Sep 7, 2012—1 finding
  • Dec 13, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction