Faith Lutheran Home
Osage, Iowa · CCN 165433
12 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2021.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 34
- Surveys
- 12
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 50
- Ownership
- Non profit - Church related
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Mitchell · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2002
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=13, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jul 16, 2025
481 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.06 | 3.76 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.68 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 56.1% | 40.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D150.0% | E150.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Faith Lutheran Home, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF700Jun 17, 2021
Based on observations, staff interviews, clinical record review, policy review, and the United States Food & Drug Administration's Guide, the facility failed to assess for initial medical need and risk of entrapment of bed rails for 4 of 14 residents (#17, #27, #28, #36) and maintain ongoing bed rail evaluations for 14 of 14 residents (#8, #13, #17, #18, #19,#20, #24, #25, #27, #28, #29, #30, #32, #36); obtain consent with education of possible risk of entrapment for 6 of 14 residents (#8, #17, #18, #20, #27, #36), and the entrapment of a resident (#27) between the side rail and mattress, all of which resulted in an immediate jeopardy and could lead to serious injury, impairment, or death. The facility reported a census of residents 33. Findings include: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF805Jul 16, 2025
Based on observation, document review, menu review, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to properly prepare pureed food to ensure each resident received the appropriate serving size and nutrients for 7 of 7 residents sampled (Residents #2, #4, #7, #17, #19, #20, and #37). The facility reported a census of 39 residents.Findings include:On 7/14/25 the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) provided an untitled document with a list of residents who received a pureed diet. The list included Residents #2, #4, #7, #17, #19, #20 and #37.A Week 2, Tuesday Noon Meal Puree Menu documented the following:a. Beef cube pepper steak pureed serving #8 scoop (4 ounces (oz))b. French onion rice, #8 scoopc. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jun 17, 2021
Based on review of infection prevention policies and procedures, staff interviews, observations, and review of hand washing policy, the facility failed to maintain infection prevention policy containing documents for transmission based precautions, antibiotic stewardship and other facility policy and procedures. During a dining observation staff failed to wash their hands appropriately. At the time of the survey, the facility reported a census of 33 residents. Resource: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021, January 8). Healthcare Providers. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/handhygiene/providers/index.html. Findings include: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF812Jul 16, 2025
Based on observation, policy review, 2022 United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, consulting Dietitian and staff interviews, the facility failed to prevent soiled gloves from coming into contact with food during the food preparation for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #14, #23, #34 and #39). The facility reported a census of 39 residents.Findings include: On 7/15/25 observed the following during the kitchen service:At 11:28 AM without completing hand hygiene, Staff A, Cook, placed the blade into the food processor with her bare right hand, she used to touch multiple other surfaces prior to touching the food processor blade. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF688Jan 12, 2023
Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide the therapy recommended restorative program to prevent potential decline for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #14 and #30) sampled. The facility identified a census of 42 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #14 with a long/short term memory impairment and severely impaired decision making ability. The Resident required total assistance with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 34 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 16, 2025Standard2 findings
- Jan 12, 2023Standard3 findings
- Jun 17, 2021Standard8 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 28, 2020Complaint3 findings
- Jul 11, 2019Standard4 findings
- Apr 5, 2018Standard2 findings
- Jan 28, 2016Standard4 findings
- Dec 18, 2014Standard2 findings
Show the 4 earlier surveys
- Oct 17, 2013—3 findings
- Apr 25, 2013—1 finding
- Sep 7, 2012—1 finding
- Dec 13, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction