Good Samaritan Society - Park River
Park River, North Dakota · CCN 355089
16 surveys since 2011, 1 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 87
- Surveys
- 16
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 44
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY
- County
- Walsh · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1984
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 42 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in North Dakota.
Last survey on record
Dec 4, 2025
340 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.02 | 4.29 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.70 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 47.4% | 50.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $27,417 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2379.3% | E620.7% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6894×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6573×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6902×
Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
- F7252×
Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Good Samaritan Society - Park River, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF725Aug 21, 2025
Based on review of facility policy, review of call light logs, and resident, family, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff and related services are available at all times to meet the residents' needs for 2 of 8 sampled residents (Resident #30 and #39), one supplemental resident (Resident #26) and 1 confidential resident (Resident A) who required staff assistance. Failure to provide sufficient staffing does not promote each resident's rights, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, and/or provide a safe environment for the residents. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Call Light occurred on 08/20/25. This policy, revised 07/08/25, stated, When residents call light is observed/heard, go to the resident's room promptly. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Aug 21, 2025
Based on observation, review of professional reference, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure food is prepared and stored in a clean and sanitary manner in 2 of 2 kitchen/nutrition centers (main kitchen and nutrition center) observed. Failure to ensure cleanliness of the kitchen and proper food storage has the potential for contamination of food and may result in a foodborne illness to residents, visitors, and staff. Findings include: The 2022 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, Chapter 4, Section 4-6, pages 20-21, Section 4-601.11 Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood-Contact Surfaces, and Utensils, stated, . (A) EQUIPMENT FOOD-CONTACT SURFACES and UTENSILS shall be clean to sight and touch. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF641Jul 11, 2024
Based on record review, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (Version 1.18.11), and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate coding of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 5 of 12 sampled residents (#1, #3, #13, #15, and #25). Failure to accurately complete the MDS does not allow each resident's assessment to reflect their current status/needs and may affect the development of a comprehensive care plan and the care provided to the residents. Findings include: SECTION GG: FUNCTIONAL ABILITIES AND GOALS The Long-Term Care Facility RAI Manual, revised October 2023, pages GG-14, GG-15, and GG-21, states . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Mar 12, 2024
Based on observation, review of facility grievances, review of the North Dakota Long Term Care Ombudsman Program's Guide to Resident Rights, and staff interview, the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity and failed to provide resident care in a manner and an environment that promotes, maintains, or enhances their quality of life on 1 of 1 days of survey. Failure to treat residents with dignity and speak respectfully has the potential to affect the residents' psychosocial wellbeing. Findings include: The North Dakota Long Term Care Ombudsman Program's Guide to Resident Rights, updated 03/21/23, stated, . The facility must treat you courteously, fairly and with dignity. Observation on 03/12/24 at 8:05 a.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF725Mar 12, 2024
Based on observation, review of facility policy, review of facility call light logs, resident interviews, and staff interview, the facility failed to promptly respond to residents' call lights for 4 of 4 confidential residents (Residents A, B, C, and D) who required staff assistance. Failure to promptly respond to resident calls for assistance may result in residents experiencing unmet needs and may negatively affect the residents' physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Call Light occurred on 03/12/24. This policy, dated 08/01/23, stated, . 2. When resident's call light is observed/heard, go to the resident's room promptly. 3. Respond to request as soon as possible. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 87 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Dec 4, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Aug 21, 2025Standard and complaint5 findings
- Feb 19, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Jul 11, 2024Standard and complaint8 findings
- Mar 12, 2024Complaint9 findings
- Jun 8, 2023Standard3 findings
- Jan 6, 2022Standard5 findings
- Nov 21, 2019Standard7 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
- Oct 31, 2018Standard5 findings
- Oct 18, 2017Standard2 findings
- Sep 8, 2016Standard1 finding
- Sep 3, 2015Standard6 findings
- Jul 23, 2014Standard11 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 18, 2013Standard9 findings
- Jun 28, 2012—6 findings
- Jun 9, 2011—6 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction