Deficiency Index

Good Samaritan Society de Smet

De Smet, South Dakota · CCN 435074

13 surveys since 2010, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
53
Surveys
13
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse5

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file9/13

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
46
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY
County
Kingsbury · rural
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
1

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 48 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in South Dakota.

Last survey on record

Oct 23, 2025

382 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.403.73
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.02—
Annual nurse turnover64.4%49.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$27,989 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG423.5%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD635.3%E635.3%F15.9%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 17 of the 53 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6552×

    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6862×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Good Samaritan Society de Smet, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Oct 23, 2025

    Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility-reported incident (FRI) review, observation, interview, record review, resource packet review, and facility assessment review, the provider failed to ensure sufficient caregiver staff were available to meet the needs of:*One of one sampled resident (1) who relied on staff assistance for repositioning and developed a Stage II (2; open wound or blister with partial-thickness skin loss) pressure ulcer to her coccyx (tailbone) after she admitted to the facility.*One of one sampled resident (2) who relied on staff assistance for toileting and incontinence care and reported certified nursing assistant (CNA) H turned off the resident's call light without assisting the resident with toileting, which contributed to the resident being… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Oct 23, 2025

    Based on complaint intake report review, record review, interview, and resource packet review, the provider failed to develop and implement pressure ulcer (skin and/or underlying tissue injury from prolonged pressure) prevention interventions for one of one sampled resident (1) identified at risk for developing pressure ulcers, and dependent on staff assistance with repositioning, who developed a Stage II (2; open wound or blister with partial-thickness skin loss) pressure ulcer to her coccyx (tailbone) after she admitted to the facility.Findings include:1. Review of the 10/17/25 anonymous complaint intake report regarding resident 1 revealed:*Resident 1 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE], after a surgery to place a rod in her left leg. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Jan 2, 2025

    Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility-reported incident (FRI), observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect when one of one sampled resident's (1) physician orders following a left lower extremity (LLE) fracture were not followed to promote healing. Findings include: 1. Review of the provider's 10/23/24 SD DOH FRI regarding resident 1 revealed: *On 10/21/24 resident 1 was being transferred with a sit-to-stand lift (mechanical lift used to assist from a seated to a standing position) and she was lowered to the floor. -CNA E assisted her up from the floor with a full body mechanical lift to the wheelchair. -Resident 1 complained of left leg pain that afternoon. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Jan 2, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to initiate preventative interventions for one of one sampled resident (1) who was at risk for and developed a pressure ulcer to her left heel after fracturing her left lower leg during a fall. Findings include: 1. Observation on 1/2/25 at 2:45 p.m. of resident 1's room revealed: *Two light blue padded heel protector boots were on the bed. *An air mattress was present and inflated on the bed frame. *Resident 1 was seated in her wheelchair listening to an audiobook with her back towards the door. *There was a gait belt, pillow, and hangers on the recliner seat. Observation and interview on 1/2/25 at 3:02 p.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 22, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to follow standard food safety practices for: *Two of two observed cooks (I and P) who had not changed their gloves or washed their hands while serving resident food items to prevent potential contamination. *One of one observed dietary aide (DA) (H) who had not performed hand hygiene (hand washing) while serving resident food items to prevent potential contamination. Findings include: 1. Observation on 5/19/25 at 5:17 p.m. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 53 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 6, 2026Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Oct 23, 2025Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
  • May 22, 2025Standard8 findings
  • Jan 2, 2025Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
  • Jan 11, 2024Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Jun 4, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Apr 6, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Jan 28, 2016Standard4 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
  • Jan 7, 2015Standard5 findings
  • Dec 11, 2013—4 findings
  • Oct 3, 2012—3 findings
  • Aug 17, 2011—6 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 14, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction