Menno-Olivet Care Center
Menno, South Dakota · CCN 435113
15 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 45
- Surveys
- 15
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 41
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Hutchinson · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1998
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=11, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Oct 30, 2024
740 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.40 | 3.73 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.01 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 35.7% | 49.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G116.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D233.3% | E116.7% | F233.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Menno-Olivet Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689May 12, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and record review the provider failed to ensure: *One of one sampled resident (18) was free from serious injury after being served hot liquids that resulted in severe [CONDITION(S)] with blistering and open wounds. *Assessments had been completed to ensure one of one sampled resident (18) was appropriate to consume hot liquids. *They had a policy in place to prevent serious injuries from hot liquids. *Preventative measures including monitoring of liquid temperatures prior to serving one of one sampled resident (18)'s serious injuries. * Findings include: On 5/10/22 at 4:48 p.m. an immediate jeopardy had been identified related to accident/hazard F689. Notice: Notice of immediate jeopardy was given verbally on 5/10/22 at 6:54 p.m. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF880May 12, 2022
A. Based on observation, interview, and record review the provider failed to ensure resident 18 had been placed on contact precautions as a result of a diagnosis [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Findings include: *One of one sampled resident (18) had open wounds and had been receiving daily dressing changes. *Endanger all residents with potential of cross contamination related to no contact precautions. On 5/10/22 at 4:48 p.m. immediate jeopardy had been identified related infection control/contact precautions F880. Notice: Notice on 5/10/22 at 6:57 p.m. interim administrator A and director of nursing B had been in formed verbally and written immediate jeopardy removal template given, and asked for an immediate jeopardy removal plan. Plan: On 5/11/22 at 10:51 a.m. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Nov 30, 2023
Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility report, record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure one of one sampled discharged resident (1) had been thoroughly assessed by nursing for change in condition and appropriately care planned for increased need for supervision and assistance with eating prior to a final choking event. Findings include: 1. Review of the 11/26/23 SD DOH facility report revealed: *On 11/25/23 at 5:40 p.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Oct 30, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the provider failed to maintain clean and sanitary conditions in one of one observed kitchen where residents' food was stored and prepared. Findings include: 1. Observation on 10/28/24 at 2:54 p.m. in the kitchen revealed: *The walk-in cooler metal wire shelving had a black substance on it. *The walk-in cooler flooring was a metal surface that contained rust and had a black substance on the caulking where the floor met the wall. *The caulked area on the food preparation counter where the countertop met the backsplash: -Had black and brown unidentified particles pressed into the caulking. -Was sticky when touched. *Area of the food preperation countertop were cracked and not sealed. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jul 27, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to prevent potential cross-contamination and follow their policy for cleaning and disinfection during floor care during one of one randomly observed resident 21's room cleaning by housekeeper M. Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on 7/26/23 at 9:05 a.m. with housekeeper M who was cleaning a randomly observed resident 21's room revealed: *There was a mop bucket with water and a mop in it outside a resident's room. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 45 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Oct 30, 2024Standard4 findings
- Nov 30, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jul 27, 2023Standard1 finding
- May 12, 2022Standard5 findings · 2 harm
- Oct 2, 2019Standard2 findings
- Aug 9, 2018Standard2 findings
- Oct 12, 2017Standard2 findings
- Jan 19, 2017Complaint3 findings
Show the 7 earlier surveys
- Aug 17, 2016Standard2 findings
- Apr 27, 2016Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 15, 2015Standard3 findings
- Jul 24, 2014Standard8 findings
- Jun 19, 2013—6 findings
- May 16, 2012—1 finding
- Apr 19, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction