Glendale Gardens Nursing & Rehab
Springfield, Missouri · CCN 265473
22 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 80
- Surveys
- 22
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 120
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- JAMES & JUDY LINCOLN
- County
- Greene
- Medicare-certified since
- 1991
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 118 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Missouri.
Last survey on record
Apr 24, 2026
199 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.15 | 3.32 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.51 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 57.3% | 57.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1852.9% | E1338.2% | F38.8% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6093×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6953×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5612×
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Glendale Gardens Nursing & Rehab, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 26, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards of practice and protect all food from possible contamination when the facility staff failed to clean the microwave used to reheat resident food, the hand washing sink, the doors and adjacent walls of the walk-in freezer and cooler, the hot chocolate machine, the dust off ceiling vents, and the side of the dishwashing area. The facility failed to repair chipped paint around ceiling vents in the food service area and repair the floor under a food preparation table and three vat sink to ensure it was a cleanable surface. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Nov 5, 2021
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to protect food from possible contamination when shelves in the kitchen and walk-in refrigerator were kept clean, when dishes were stacked while still wet, and when dented cans were stored with other food items to be used. The facility census was 79. 1. Record review of the facility policy, Nutrition and Dining Service Manual, Section 8, Sanitation, dated April 2011, showed the following: -Dish room work surfaces must be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition; -All items are to be air dried; -No moisture can be found on any stacked item; -All items must be stored inverted, covered, or stacked with top of dish/tray inverted; -Pots, pans and utensils will be air dried before being stored or will be stored in a… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF921Nov 5, 2021
Based on observation and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure all hoses which extended below the flood plane had a backflow preventer. This had the potential to contaminate the entire facility's potable water supply. The facility staff failed to ensure the resident's bathroom doors were free of gashes. The facility had a census of 79. 1. Observation on 11/2/21, starting at 10:30 A.M., showed no backflow preventer devices on the hoses located in the following rooms that could extend below the flood plane: - A101; - A103; - A105; - A109; - B201; - B205; - B207; - B209; - B213; - C-hall main shower room; - C305; - C307; - C309; - C311; - C313; - D400; - D403; - D405; - D409; - D411; - D417. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Dec 11, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed ensure an environment as free from accident hazards as possible when staff failed to analyze and identify the risks for falls, failed to implement new intervention to prevent future falls, and failed to care plan regarding new falls for three residents (Resident #1, #3, and #4) that sustained falls. The facility census was 93. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding falls. Review of the facility policy titled Care Plan Comprehensive, undated, showed the following:-An individual comprehensive care plan should include measurable goals and timeframes;-The comprehensive care plan will be based on a thorough assessment that includes, but is not limited to the Minimum Data Sheet (MDS - a federally… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF561Dec 10, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate each resident's right of self-determination in support of resident choice when staff failed to honor resident preferences for shower frequency for four residents (Resident #6, #11, #23, and #33). The facility census was 91.Review of the facility procedure for Bath/Shower, undated, the purpose of a shower is to maintain the resident's skin integrity, comfort, and cleanliness.1.Review of Resident #6's face sheet showed the following:-admission date of 02/23/14;-readmission date of 02/23/23;-Diagnoses included cerebral palsy (a group of conditions that affect movement and posture), spastic hemiplegia (a neuromuscular condition that results in the muscles on one side of the body being contracted)… […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 80 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 24, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Mar 4, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Dec 11, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Dec 10, 2025Standard10 findings
- Jul 1, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Aug 1, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Feb 8, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Jan 26, 2024Standard6 findings
Show the 14 earlier surveys
- Mar 8, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Oct 25, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jul 25, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Nov 5, 2021Standard8 findings
- May 8, 2019Standard4 findings
- Aug 28, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Jun 19, 2018Standard9 findings
- May 11, 2017Standard4 findings
- Jun 24, 2016Standard6 findings
- Nov 4, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Mar 3, 2015Standard and complaint5 findings
- May 21, 2012—6 findings
- Apr 29, 2011—6 findings
- Feb 23, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction