Gem City Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center
Dayton, Ohio · CCN 365981
20 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2023.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 71
- Surveys
- 20
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 87
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE
- County
- Montgomery
- Medicare-certified since
- 1994
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 391 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Ohio.
Last survey on record
May 21, 2026
172 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.99 | 3.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.11 | — |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2271.0% | E619.4% | F26.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C13.2% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5842×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F7602×
Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Gem City Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Mar 13, 2023
Based on medical record review, staff interview, physician interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to initiate wound treatments, assess wounds weekly, and consult wound care as ordered. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #3 when a facility acquired wound increased in size. This affected Resident #3 of three reviewed. The census was two. Findings include: Review of Resident #3's closed medical record revealed an admitted [DATE]. Diagnoses listed included hypertension, acute and chronic respiratory failure, seizures, hydrocephalus, dysphagia, schizophrenia, type II diabetes mellitus, and respiratory ventilator dependence. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Mar 13, 2023
Based on medical record review, staff and physician interviews, review of facility policy, and review National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) information, the facility failed to initiate pressure ulcer treatments, complete pressure ulcer treatments as ordered, assess pressure ulcers weekly, and consult wound care as ordered. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #03's facility acquired pressure ulcers to the right and left rear thighs increased in size. This affected one (#03) of three residents reviewed for skin breakdown. The census was two. Findings include: Review of Resident #03's closed medical record revealed an admitted [DATE]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880May 21, 2026
Based on record review, observation, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to wear proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing personal care. This affected one Resident #02 out of 23 residents requiring PPE for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). the faciity also failed to ensure clean linens were stored appropriately. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 33.Findings include: 1. A chart review revealed Resident #02 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including hemiplegia/hemiparesis, dysphagia, diabetes, and depression. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF584Jul 1, 2025
Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure comfortable and safe temperatures were maintained throughout the facility when temperatures exceeded 95 degrees Fahrenheit (F) in resident rooms. This affected all ten residents (#01, #02, #03, #04, #05, #06, #07, #108, #109 and #158) residing in the facility. The facility census was 10. Findings include: Interview with Resident #04 on 06/29/25 at 9:50 A.M. revealed it was hot in her room. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF921Jun 3, 2022
Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and policy review the facility failed to provide a facility environment with temperatures below 81 degrees Fahrenheit. This had the potential to affect every resident in the facility. The facility census was 45. Findings include: Interview on 05/31/22 at 9:10 A.M. with the Administrator revealed the facility did have a problem with higher air temperatures within the facility over the past week. The Administrator confirmed that the facility might be hot or cold depending on the weather outside. The facility had contracted the help of a local Heating and Air conditioning company many times in the month of May 2022. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 71 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 21, 2026Standard and complaint16 findings
- Jul 1, 2025Standard6 findings
- Mar 13, 2023Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Nov 28, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jun 3, 2022Complaint3 findings
- Aug 10, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jul 1, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Dec 5, 2019Standard5 findings
Show the 12 earlier surveys
- Oct 7, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Feb 6, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Jan 31, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Oct 3, 2018Standard4 findings
- Aug 10, 2017Standard5 findings
- May 2, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Dec 19, 2013—4 findings
- Aug 1, 2013—2 findings
- Aug 24, 2012—4 findings
- May 12, 2011—2 findings
- Apr 20, 2011—2 findings
- Apr 29, 2010—7 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction