Deficiency Index

Future Care Sandtown-Winchester

Baltimore, Maryland · CCN 215271

22 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
106
Surveys
22
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file17/22

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
148
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
FUTURE CARE/LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH
County
Baltimore City
Medicare-certified since
1995

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 90 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Maryland.

Last survey on record

Apr 13, 2026

210 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.593.50
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.65—
Annual nurse turnover14.8%42.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3280.0%E717.5%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C12.5%
CMS’s current file: 40 of the 106 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5843×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6002×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Future Care Sandtown-Winchester, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF558Feb 6, 2025

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that call bells were kept within reach for residents to utilize. This deficient practice was evidenced in 5 (#57, #38, #66, #37 and #152) of 28 residents during the survey. The findings include: 1. On 2/3/2025 at approximately 9:30 AM, during a tour of the facility it was observed in Resident #57's room that the call bell was under the resident's bed. The call bell itself was a regular push-style call button that due to the resident's arm and hand contractures it would be difficult to use. During this tour, GNA #22 was asked where the call bell was. The GNA went to the head of the bed, reached under it and retrieved the call bell and attached it to the resident's bed sheet. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF567Feb 6, 2025

    Based on review of administrative records and interviews with staff, it was determined during the investigative phase of the survey, that the facility failed to permit 5 of 5 residents (#45, #72, #78, #67, #77) to access their personal funds. The findings include: On 8/6/2024 a complaint MD00208837 was submitted to the Office of Health Care Quality regarding the ability of the residents to access their personal funds. The surveyor interviewed Staff #52, the Business Office Manager on 2/4/2025 at 1:15 pm who stated that the Administrator, Staff #1 was aware of the need for petty cash to be available to the residents when she was not onsite. She provided The Resident Statements for 5 residents (#45, 72, 78, 67,77), the Surety Bond, a Trial Balance sheet and the Resident Trust fund policy. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF609Feb 6, 2025

    Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to: 1.) report an allegation of abuse to the state agency within the 2-hour allotted timeframe; 2.) report episodes of a resident's falls in a timely manner to the resident representative, physician, and facility administrative staff; 3.) report the results of the final investigation within five working days to the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) This was evident for 2 out of 12 facility reported incidents reviewed, 2 out 4 residents (#134 andResident #40) reviewed intakes during the survey. The findings include: 1. On 02/06/25 at 10:30 am a review of the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) involving Resident #66 revealed the alleged incident occurred on 01/30/25 during the 3:00 pm - 11:00 pm shift. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Feb 6, 2025

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to: 1.) have quarterly care plan meetings; 2.) ensure a resident was offered the opportunity to participate in their care planning process by being invited to their care plan meeting; and 3.) complete resident care plan meetings that were prepared and revised by the entire interdisciplinary team. This was evident for: 2 (#37 & #121) of 2 resident records reviewed for care plan meeting, 2 (Resident #10, #39) out of 4 residents investigated for care planning during the survey. The findings include: A care plan is used to summarize a person's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments and outlines what needs to be done to plan, assess, and manage care. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Feb 6, 2025

    Based on observations and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The findings include: 1) During observation rounds with Director of Food Service staff #7 on 01/29/25 at 07:56 AM, the kitchen's dry goods storage room was observed to have sealed bins of flour, sugar, rice, and food thickener; canned beets and banana pudding; and bags of croutons without expiration dates labeled on them. During observation rounds with Director of Food Service on 01/29/25 at 08:09 AM, the kitchen's refrigerator was observed to have 9 Imperial chocolate shake cartons without expiration or a used by dates labeled on them. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 106 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 13, 2026Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Oct 21, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 6, 2025Standard and complaint21 findings
  • Sep 29, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 18, 2020Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Aug 20, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 21, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 17, 2018Standard7 findings
Show the 14 earlier surveys
  • Oct 17, 2017Complaint4 findings
  • Apr 28, 2017Standard12 findings
  • Mar 28, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 15, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Oct 28, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 18, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 29, 2014Standard8 findings
  • Dec 19, 2013—3 findings
  • Aug 2, 2013—8 findings
  • Jun 19, 2013—4 findings
  • May 7, 2012—2 findings
  • Jan 25, 2012—4 findings
  • Mar 25, 2011—4 findings
  • Mar 15, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction