Deficiency Index

Allegany Health Nursing and Rehab

Cumberland, Maryland · CCN 215230

19 surveys since 2010, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
83
Surveys
19
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse3

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file16/19

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
153
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE
County
Allegany · rural
Medicare-certified since
1991

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=19, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Apr 3, 2026

220 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.353.50
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.73—
Annual nurse turnover28.1%42.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$18,636 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG28.7%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2087.0%E14.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 23 of the 83 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F5521×

    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.

  • F6001×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6041×

    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.

  • F6071×

    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Allegany Health Nursing and Rehab, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF678Jan 24, 2025

    Based on reviews of a facility-reported incident, a closed medical record and all pertinent information and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to identify a newly admitted Resident who was admitted without clear physician's order for end-of-life care and failed to follow the facility policy to initiate Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR). This was evident for 1 (Resident #902) of 11 facility-reported incidents reviewed during an annual recertification survey. The facility implemented effective and thorough corrective measures following this incident and prior to the start of this survey. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jan 24, 2025

    Based on reviews of a facility-reported incident, a closed medical record and all pertinent information, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision and follow the resident's plan of care to: 1) prevent a fractured humerus during a transfer, and 2) to prevent a cognitively and functionally impaired resident from sliding out of bed onto the floor and receiving bilateral fractured hips. This was evident for 2 (Residents #909, #906) out of 11 facility-reported incidents resulting in harm to both residents reviewed during the survey. The facility implemented effective and thorough corrective measures following this incident and prior to the start of this survey. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Apr 3, 2026

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected a resident's current status. This was found to be evident for one (Resident #28) out of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers.The findings include:The Minimum Date Set (MDS) is a complete assessment of the Resident that provides the facility with the information needed to develop a care plan, deliver the appropriate care and services, and modify the care plan based on the Resident's status. Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed a wound specialist note, dated 3/11/26, that documented the presence of an unstageable deep tissue injury (DTI) on the resident's right lateral foot. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF657Apr 3, 2026

    Based on interview and medical record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an interdisciplinary care plan meeting was held to review and revise the resident's care plan after the completion of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This was found to be evident for one (Resident #6) out of two resident's reviewed for urinary catheter use.The findings include: Care Conferences, also known as care plan meetings, are interdisciplinary team meetings that are to occur following the completion of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. The MDS is a complete assessment of the Resident that provides the facility with the information needed to develop a care plan, deliver the appropriate care and services, and modify the care plan based on the Resident's status. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF679Apr 3, 2026

    Based on medical record review, observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the provision of activities to meet the needs of residents with dementia. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #122 and #9) out of 5 residents reviewed for dementia care.The findings include1.Review of Resident 122's medical record revealed the resident has resided at the facility for more than 6 months, was legally blind and had dementia. The resident resided on the secured unit, in which a code was required to gain access to the elevator to leave the unit. On 3/30/26 at 11:09 AM Resident #122 was observed ambulating in the hallway, dressed for the day. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 83 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 3, 2026Standard and complaint11 findings
  • Jan 24, 2025Standard and complaint8 findings · 2 harm
  • Nov 24, 2020Infection control2 findings
  • Sep 29, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 20, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Oct 10, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 19, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 24, 2018Standard9 findings
Show the 11 earlier surveys
  • Oct 20, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • May 18, 2017Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Sep 22, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 27, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 19, 2016Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Nov 21, 2014Standard6 findings
  • Sep 12, 2013—4 findings
  • Aug 17, 2012—8 findings
  • Jan 20, 2012—3 findings
  • Jun 16, 2011—7 findings
  • Nov 17, 2010—2 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction