Deficiency Index

Future Care Pineview

Clinton, Maryland · CCN 215328

30 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
138
Surveys
30
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file25/30

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
180
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
FUTURE CARE/LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH
County
Prince Georges
Medicare-certified since
1999

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 90 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Maryland.

Last survey on record

Jan 13, 2026

300 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.143.50
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.15—
Annual nurse turnover39.2%42.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2674.3%E720.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B12.9%C12.9%
CMS’s current file: 35 of the 138 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6922×

    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.

  • F8042×

    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Future Care Pineview, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF690Oct 22, 2025

    Based on reviews of a complaint, a closed medical record and all pertinent documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with a physician's orders to document the output from a Foley catheter was completed. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed during the complaint survey.The findings include:Review of complaint 2618283 on 10/22/25 revealed an allegation Resident #1's Foley catheter was not working properly and Resident #1 had to be transferred to the hospital on [DATE].During review of complaint 2618283 on 10/22/25, revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to a spinal cord injury, paraplegia, and an indwelling Foley catheter. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF578Aug 7, 2025

    Based on resident medical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents or family representatives with an opportunity to formulate an Advanced Directive. This was evident for 6 (Residents #5, #6, #18, #37, #50 and #56) out of 9 residents reviewed during the recertification survey.The findings include: On 07/31/25 at 7:22 AM, Resident #5's medical record was reviewed. During the medical record review, the surveyor was unable to locate an Advance Directives or evidence that an Advance Directive was offered to the resident or family representative.On 07/31/25 at 7:31 AM, Resident #6's medical record was reviewed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Aug 7, 2025

    Based on observations and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to: 1) Ensure that the kitchen is clean and free of dirty dishes; 2) Ensure that the low temp dish wash machine maintained the required temperatures for the wash and rinse cycle; 3) Ensure that expired foods were discarded; 4) Remove all standing water located on the floor in the kitchen. This was found to be evident during an initial and follow-up tour of the kitchen survey has the potential to impact residents receiving food prepared in the kitchen. Findings include: An initial tour was conducted of the kitchen on 7/30/25 at 07:55 AM with the Dietary Manager (DM) Staff # 11 present. The following concerns were identified: 1. A staff member was observed washing dishes in the 3-Compartment Sink. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF842Aug 7, 2025

    Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews it was determined the facility failed to: 1) accurately reflect on its facility matrix the number of residents on transmissions precautions, and/or contact precautions, and/or the number of facility acquired pressure ulcers and/or pressure ulcers acquired during a resident's admission. This was evident to be true for the three submissions of the facility matrix presented to the survey team; 2) The facility failed to document the start times on the continuous tube feeding bag. This was evident for 1 (Resident #166) of 2 residents with continuous tube feedings; 3) update residents infection control status in the electronic medical record. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF947Aug 7, 2025

    Based on record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs) completed required annual in-service training timely. This was evident for 3 (GNA #16, #31, and #34) out of 4 employee records reviewed for required in-service training during the annual survey. The findings include:On 8/7/2025 at 9:15AM, the Surveyor reviewed the employee files of 4 Geriatric Nursing Assistants, GNA #16, #31, #34, and #35. A review of GNA #16, #31, and #34 employee files failed to reveal timely completion of annual in-service training courses due every 12 months for 2024 and 2025.On 8/7/2025 at 1:00PM, during an interview with Regional Clinical Nurse #4, the Surveyor requested copies of the GNA's assigned in-service courses for 2024 and… […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 138 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 13, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 22, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 7, 2025Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Oct 26, 2022Standard and complaint19 findings
  • Mar 17, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 31, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 26, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 3, 2019Complaint2 findings
Show the 22 earlier surveys
  • Jan 16, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Nov 15, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 25, 2018Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 19, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 20, 2017Standard and complaint14 findings
  • Jun 1, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 20, 2016Complaint4 findings
  • Jun 10, 2016Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Feb 24, 2016Complaint4 findings
  • Oct 22, 2015Complaint4 findings
  • Mar 19, 2015Standard15 findings
  • Feb 3, 2015Complaint3 findings
  • Sep 29, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 11, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 10, 2014Standard10 findings
  • Jun 25, 2013—2 findings
  • Mar 19, 2013—2 findings
  • Oct 5, 2012—13 findings
  • Jun 14, 2012—1 finding
  • Sep 1, 2011—1 finding
  • Mar 16, 2011—2 findings
  • Jun 24, 2010—8 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction