Frederick Villa Healthcare
Catonsville, Maryland · CCN 215178
33 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2026.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 215
- Surveys
- 33
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 125
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- ENGAGE HEALTHCARE
- County
- Baltimore
- Medicare-certified since
- 1989
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 43 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Maryland.
Last survey on record
May 6, 2026
187 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.28 | 3.55 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.59 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 42.2% | 43.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G11.4% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D5782.6% | E710.1% | F34.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B11.4% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8425×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F6844×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F5843×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6413×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6573×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Frederick Villa Healthcare, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF697May 6, 2026
Based on resident interviews, record review, reviews of other pertinent documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to treat a resident who complained of severe pain resulting in harm to the resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include:In an interview with Resident #1 and a family member on 05/04/26 at 11:07 am, Resident #1 complained of pain in the groin area. Resident #1 moaned in pain with any movement while seated during the interview. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF882Aug 28, 2025
Based on facility documentation and an interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have a qualified Infection Preventionist (IP). This failure has the potential to affect all residents in the facility.The findings include:An Infection Preventionist is responsible for assessing, developing, implementing, and monitoring a facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program to prevent and control infections.During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 8/26/25 at 12:38 PM, the DON stated that Staff #29 (regional Assistant Director of Nursing and Infection Preventionist) was collaborating as the IP for the facility. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF925Aug 28, 2025
Based on review of complaint 337259 and the facility's pest problem logs and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. This deficient practice had the potential to impact all residents.The findings include:Review of complaint 337259 on 8/25/25 at 12:13 PM revealed that the facility was infested with roaches and rodents.The surveyor requested the facility's pest logs from 2025 on 8/27/25 at 7:42 AM. Review of the Pest Problem Log on 8/27/25 at 9:42 AM revealed the following entries in patient care areas:11/13/24 room [ROOM NUMBER]: roaches, mice11/13/24 room [ROOM NUMBER]: roaches, mice1/21/25 room [ROOM NUMBER]: roaches2/6/25 Medication room [ROOM NUMBER], 2, 3: ants, roaches, mice, mice droppings4/21/25 Rooms… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 13, 2023
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to store and serve food according to professional standards. This deficient practice has the potential to affect the residents with meal service within the Candlelight Dining Room. The findings include: On 04/04/23 at 8:04 am, during the initial walk-through of the kitchen with the Certified Dietary Manager #5 there was an outdated container of lunch meat dated 02/28/23 and a box of Zucchini that was spoiled in the freezer. On 04/04/23 at 12:20 PM, during a dining observation during lunch in the Candlelight Dining Room, the staff were observed serving drinks and plates of food without gloves on their hands. The surveyor observed four staff serving the residents. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF609Aug 28, 2025
Based on review of facility reported incidents (Intake #2578127, # 337212 and #337236), record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all alleged resident violations were reported in a timely manner, including: abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment. This was evident for 6 (Resident #86, # 143, #71 #101, #2, and #140) of 76 Residents that were part of the survey sample.The findings included: 1) On 08/19/2025 at 9:04 AM, during the initial screening phase of the survey, Resident #86 alleged to the surveyor that “on the last Sunday night shift (8/17/2025) a nurse was very mean and rough with the resident during care and when her attitude was brought to her attention by Resident #86, she just left the room and never came back. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 215 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 7, 2026Complaint5 findings
- May 6, 2026Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 23, 2026Complaint5 findings
- Aug 28, 2025Standard and complaint30 findings
- Apr 13, 2023Standard and complaint12 findings
- Dec 13, 2022Complaint5 findings
- Feb 5, 2021Complaint4 findings
- Oct 9, 2020Complaint3 findings
Show the 25 earlier surveys
- Jun 29, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jun 26, 2019Complaint1 finding
- May 28, 2019Standard and complaint17 findings
- Aug 6, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Apr 16, 2018Complaint3 findings
- Apr 3, 2018Complaint3 findings
- Dec 21, 2017Standard22 findings
- Oct 6, 2017Complaint9 findings
- Apr 6, 2017Complaint6 findings
- Jan 30, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Oct 28, 2016Complaint3 findings
- Oct 14, 2016Standard3 findings
- Dec 18, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Aug 18, 2015Standard and complaint14 findings
- Nov 12, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Oct 20, 2014Complaint1 finding
- May 20, 2014Standard and complaint9 findings
- Oct 1, 2013—4 findings
- Sep 9, 2013—1 finding
- May 10, 2013—12 findings
- Aug 20, 2012—1 finding
- Apr 19, 2012—4 findings
- Dec 27, 2011—8 findings
- May 3, 2011—13 findings
- Mar 23, 2011—5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction