Deficiency Index

Anchorage Rehabilitation and Wellness Center

Salisbury, Maryland · CCN 215339

27 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
169
Surveys
27
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file20/27

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
126
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Wicomico
Medicare-certified since
2002

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
4
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 43 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Maryland.

Last survey on record

Mar 20, 2026

234 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.333.55
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.60—
Annual nurse turnover32.1%43.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$10,033 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD8285.4%E1313.5%F11.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 96 of the 169 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8425×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

  • F5844×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6574×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F5503×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5803×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Anchorage Rehabilitation and Wellness Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF921Dec 10, 2025

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary and comfortable environment, as evidenced by persistent odors of urine throughout multiple resident care floors and common areas. This deficient practice was observed on three separate dates during the annual survey and had the potential to impact all residents, staff, and visitors in the facility.Findings include:On 12/04/2025 at 7:30 AM, upon entry into the facility, the surveyor detected a strong, pungent odor of urine in the main lobby on ground floor, which was consistently present throughout the hallways of floor G, floor 1, and floor 3. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF924Feb 20, 2026

    Based on record review and observation, interviews showed the facility failed to make sure handrails were firmly secured and affixed to the wall on the facility's. This was was true for 2 of 4 floors of the facility. Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled, Policy for Facilities Maintenance Program dated 8/12/2025 documented, the purpose of this policy is to ensure a well-structured preventative maintenance program for a nursing home facility is crucial for ensuring safety, functionality, and a pleasant living environment for residents. Record review of the facility work order created on 1/18/2026, showed Administrator-1 documented handrails on the second floor needed attention and concluded the priority was high. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Dec 10, 2025

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1.) use appropriate infection control practices according to professional standards of practice, 2.) ensure hand sanitizer supply was available at all dispensers, 3.) implement infection control practices to ensure oxygen equipment was dated when put into use, 4.) ensure linens were handled in a safe and sanitary manner. This deficient practice was evident for: 1.) 5 resident rooms observed during breakfast tray collection and 4 residents (Resident #77, #4, #113, and #35) observed during medication administration and 2.) 3 out of 8 hand sanitizer dispensers located on the second floor during the facility's recertification survey, 3.) 1 (Resident #7) of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen equipment and 4) 1… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Mar 29, 2024

    Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This was found to be evident throughout the facility and for seven (Resident #17, #21, #82, #10, #2, #15 and #19) out of 43 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: 1) On 3/17/24 at 1:35 PM, an initial tour of the dry storage area of the kitchen revealed a puddle of standing water on the floor underneath and in front of one of the dry storage racks. There was also damaged floor tiles and at least two damaged baseboard tiles. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF623Mar 29, 2024

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure that the required information is provided to residents or their representatives in writing when a resident is discharged to the hospital. This was found to be evident for 3 (Resident #24, #7, #61, and #43) out of 43 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #24's medical record on 3/21/24 revealed the resident had resided at the facility since April 2023. The resident was discharged to the hospital in December 2023 due to a fever. Review of the resident's paper chart revealed an Acute Transfer Letter, dated 12/12/2023. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 169 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 20, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 20, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 10, 2025Standard13 findings
  • Nov 7, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 29, 2024Standard32 findings
  • Jan 12, 2024Complaint13 findings
  • May 21, 2021Complaint11 findings
  • Jun 11, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 19 earlier surveys
  • May 1, 2019Standard and complaint31 findings
  • Nov 15, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 15, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • May 24, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 3, 2017Standard7 findings
  • Sep 21, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 22, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 18, 2016Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Oct 5, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 20, 2015Standard and complaint17 findings
  • Jun 13, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Feb 27, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jun 21, 2013—1 finding
  • May 31, 2013—7 findings
  • Apr 18, 2013—1 finding
  • Mar 19, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Nov 29, 2012—1 finding
  • Apr 13, 2012—1 finding
  • Mar 11, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction