Foundation Park Care Center
Toledo, Ohio · CCN 365752
37 surveys since 2010, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 150
- Surveys
- 37
- Harm or worse
- 7
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 109
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- NURSING CARE MANAGEMENT OF AMERICA
- County
- Lucas
- Medicare-certified since
- 1989
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 118 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Ohio.
Last survey on record
Jul 30, 2026
102 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 2.89 | 3.51 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.53 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 28.2% | 51.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $76,345 across 2 penalties
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J11.8% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G23.6% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3664.3% | E1017.9% | F712.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6894×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5803×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6843×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F8033×
Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
- F9213×
Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Foundation Park Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF678Aug 4, 2025
Based on closed medical record review, staff interview, review of a written staff statement and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to initiate Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) or call nine-one-one (911) for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) assistance for Resident #100, who was found unresponsive, absent of breaths, without a pulse/heartbeat and was identified to have advance directives reflecting the resident was a Full Code (full life-saving measures to be taken in the event of cardiac/respiratory arrest) status. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening harm/death on [DATE] when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #400 went to Resident #100's room to check his blood sugar levels and found the resident to be unresponsive and absent of vital signs. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Jun 15, 2021
THIS IS AN INCIDENCE OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on staff interview, medical record review, review of the facility's Self-Reported Incident (SRI) and investigation, and review of the facility's policy for abuse, the facility failed to ensure one female resident (#100), who had severe cognitive impairment and wandered, was free from sexual abuse from one male resident (#110), who displayed signs of sexual inappropriacy and whose plan of care was absent for interventions related to sexual behaviors. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the likelihood of serious harm on 05/09/21 at 11:08 A.M. when staff found Resident #110 on top of Resident #100 in Resident #110's bed. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Feb 26, 2026
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented to prevent a pressure ulcer from increasing in size and stage. This resulted in actual harm beginning on 12/22/25 when one resident (#01), who was identified at low risk for pressure ulcer development, was discovered with a Stage II pressure ulcer which increased in size and depth and was assessed as an unstageable pressure ulcer with malodorous necrotic tissue 19 days after being discovered. The facility failed to provide any reassessment of the resident's condition and for a possible source of the pressure ulcer and no nutritional assessments had been completed from the time when the pressure ulcer was initially identified. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 30, 2023
Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a visually impaired resident who was at risk for falls, was provided a proper room set up to prevent falls. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #10 had a room change on 08/03/23 at 11:45 A.M., fell in the new room on 08/03/23 at approximately 3:50 P.M., was transported to the hospital and found to have a fracture of the right humerus (shoulder). This affected one (Resident #10) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 88. Finding include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admitted [DATE]. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jun 20, 2023
Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the facility's incident report, review of the hospital record, and review of a personnel file, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with sufficient staff supervision when positioned in bed during direct care. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #74 sustained multiple fractures, when State tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #117 rolled the resident away from the STNA during care, the resident rolled off the bed, landed on the floor, and was subsequently sent to the local hospital where the resident was diagnosed with a fractured right hip, pelvis, and right knee. This affected one resident (#74) of five residents reviewed. […]
Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 150 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 30, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Apr 16, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Mar 12, 2026Standard15 findings
- Feb 26, 2026Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 25, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Aug 4, 2025Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 5, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Aug 29, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 29 earlier surveys
- May 16, 2024Standard8 findings
- Oct 2, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Aug 30, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 20, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 19, 2022Standard16 findings
- Oct 25, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Sep 29, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Aug 11, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jun 15, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 15, 2020Infection control2 findings
- Jan 16, 2020Standard6 findings
- Oct 18, 2019Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 8, 2019Complaint1 finding
- May 1, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Nov 7, 2018Standard13 findings
- Jul 2, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Nov 30, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Sep 21, 2017Standard7 findings
- Aug 9, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Dec 20, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Nov 22, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Jul 14, 2016Standard10 findings
- Apr 9, 2015Standard4 findings
- Jan 23, 2014—1 finding
- Oct 4, 2012—7 findings
- Oct 6, 2011—2 findings
- Jun 30, 2011—4 findings
- Feb 23, 2011—2 findings
- Apr 9, 2010—17 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction