Forum Parkway Health & Rehabilitation
Bedford, Texas · CCN 676405
15 surveys since 2017. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 38
- Surveys
- 15
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 139
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- HMG HEALTHCARE
- County
- Tarrant
- Medicare-certified since
- 2016
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 209 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
Jun 2, 2026
160 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.71 | 3.26 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.71 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 49.1% | 55.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $19,083 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K14.2% | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1250.0% | E1145.8% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6773×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F7553×
Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
- F6922×
Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
- F8062×
Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Forum Parkway Health & Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF686Sep 19, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident receives care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and does not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable for 1 of 2 residents (Resident # 1) reviewed for quality of care. The facility did not prevent the development of one facility-acquired Stage IV pressure injury on the right calf for Resident #1. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 09/18/2024. The IJ Template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 12:55PM. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF695Jan 13, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #47) reviewed for oxygen. The facility failed to have accurate physician orders for oxygen use for Resident #47. This failure could place residents who received oxygen therapy at risk for inadequate or inappropriate amounts of oxygen delivery and possible infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #47's Admission Record dated 01/08/25 reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF698Jan 13, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #48) reviewed for dialysis. The facility failed to ensure dialysis communication forms were completed for Resident #48 before going for dialysis and after returning from dialysis treatment. This failure could place residents at risk of inadequate communication between the facility and dialysis center. Findings included: Record review of Resident #48's admission MDS assessment, dated 11/25/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF755Jan 13, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor and verify that the feeding tube is in the right location (e.g., stomach or small intestine, depending on the tube) before administering medications to prevent complications for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #92) reviewed for feeding tubes and for 1 of 2 refrigerators and 2 of 2 medication rooms reviewed for pharmacy procedures. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN J checked for residual (the amount of liquid remaining in the stomach after an enteral feeding) before administering medication to Resident #92. This failure could place residents at risk for adverse effects due to inappropriate management of g-tube care. 2. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF757Jan 13, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary medication for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #89) reviewed for adequate monitoring of unnecessary medication. The facility did not monitor Resident #89 for side-effects related to the use of the anti-anxiety medication Buspirone, hypnotic medication Zolpidem Tartrate, and the anti-psychotic medication Ingrezza. This failure could place the residents at risk for adverse consequences of medication. Findings included: Record review of Resident #89's admission record, dated 01/08/25, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 38 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 2, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Mar 19, 2026Standard2 findings
- Nov 19, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jul 29, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jan 13, 2025Standard8 findings
- Nov 5, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Sep 19, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 20, 2023Standard and complaint8 findings
Show the 7 earlier surveys
- Aug 9, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Oct 20, 2022Standard1 finding
- May 18, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Mar 14, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Aug 20, 2021Standard3 findings
- Nov 30, 2018Standard5 findings
- Oct 26, 2017Standard3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Silsbee Oaks Health Care LLPSilsbee3 harm findings
- Friendship Haven Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenFriendswood4 harm findings
- Inspiration Hills Rehabilitation CenterSan Antoniono harm findings
- The Courtyards at PasadenaPasadena3 harm findings
- Oakmont Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center of KaKaty1 harm finding
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction