Deficiency Index

Silsbee Oaks Health Care LLP

Silsbee, Texas · CCN 676008

18 surveys since 2013, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
64
Surveys
18
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
6
The record, 2013–2026
’13’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy6

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file14/18

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
160
Ownership
For profit - Partnership
Chain
Independent
County
Hardin
Medicare-certified since
2004

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
4
Staffing
1
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 209 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

Jan 28, 2026

285 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.103.26
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.12—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ18.3%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD975.0%E216.7%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 12 of the 64 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F5781×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F6401×

    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.

  • F6581×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6771×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Silsbee Oaks Health Care LLP, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Sep 15, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision after a resident expressed suicidal ideations (she wanted to die). The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance (PNC). The Immediate Jeopardy began on 9/10/2023 and ended on 9/11/2023. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate supervision and interventions for suicidal thoughts and attempts which could lead to residents sustaining serious injury or harm. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF580Feb 3, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician when there was an accident which resulted in injury and required physician intervention for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for change of condition. Resident #1 was on an anticoagulant therapy and the facility did not: *consult with the physician when Resident #1 fell and hit her head sustaining a laceration to her head on [DATE] at 2:00 p.m. *consult with the physician when Resident #1 began vomiting at approximately 5:00 p.m. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Feb 3, 2023

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive care plan for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for treatment and services. The facility did not consult with the physician or provide interventions when Resident #1 fell and hit her head and began vomiting approximately 3 hours after the fall on [DATE]. The resident was on anticoagulant therapy and was admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of intracranial bleed on [DATE]. Resident #1 was admitted to Hospice services and died on [DATE]. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on [DATE] The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:35 p.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF640Jan 28, 2026

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to transmit encoded, accurate, and complete MDS data to the CMS System within 14 days after a facility completes the resident's assessment for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for MDS transmission. (Resident #s #3, #87, and #98) The facility failed to complete and transmit a Discharge MDS assessment for Resident #3 within 14 days of completion.The facility failed to initiate and complete Discharge MDS assessments for Resident #s #87 and #98 within 14 days of discharge. These failures could place residents at risk of not having their assessment and care plan completed timely, which could result in denial of services and/or payment for services.Findings included:1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF908Jan 28, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for essential equipment. The facility did not ensure the gas stove was in safe operating condition. This failure could place the residents at risk of a fire and not receiving their meals in a timely manner.Findings included: During an observation and interview on 01/26/26 at 9:30 a.m., DM turned on the burners on the stove. 2 of 10 burners (front left first burner and the back third burner) did not light using their pilot lights. The stove did not have an odor of escaping gas. DM said sometimes the 2 burners were slow to light but had been lighting and she turned the 2 burners off. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 64 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 28, 2026Standard6 findings
  • Oct 30, 2024Standard2 findings
  • Sep 15, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 30, 2023Standard3 findings
  • Feb 3, 2023Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Sep 28, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 20, 2022Infection control1 finding
  • Jun 29, 2022Standard and complaint6 findings
Show the 10 earlier surveys
  • Apr 28, 2021Standard2 findings
  • Sep 17, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Aug 14, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Sep 20, 2018Standard5 findings
  • Sep 28, 2017Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 23, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Nov 30, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Oct 28, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Sep 25, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Aug 8, 2013—14 findings · 3 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction