Deficiency Index

Ferncliff Nursing Home Co Inc

Rhinebeck, New York · CCN 335405

19 surveys since 2010, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
81
Surveys
19
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
6
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy6

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/19

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
309
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
ARCHCARE
County
Dutchess
Medicare-certified since
1973

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
1
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 259 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in New York.

Last survey on record

Nov 14, 2025

360 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.253.37
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.43—
Annual nurse turnover40.7%33.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG12.9%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2573.5%E823.5%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 34 of the 81 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6894×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6003×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6772×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Ferncliff Nursing Home Co Inc, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Nov 14, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review during an abbreviated survey (# 2658277), the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse by a staff member for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident # 1) reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, on 10/13/2025, Resident #1 who had severe cognitive impairment was slapped in the face by Licensed Practical Nurse #3 after an argument between Resident #1 and Licensed Practical Nurse #3 over a piece of cake. Subsequently, Resident #1 sustained redness and swelling to their right cheek and was crying. Resident #1 was led to their room by Certified Nurse Aide #1 where they consoled them and encouraged the resident to relax. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF725Feb 27, 2025

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00368899) surveys from 2/20/25 to 2/27/25, the facility did not ensure that there was sufficient nursing staff to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, 1) on sixty-nine (69) of ninety-six (96) shifts the facility did not provide the minimum number of staff documented in the facility Minimum Staffing Standard Matrix, and on nine (9) of thirty-two (32) night shifts the facility did not provide the minimum number of staff documented in the general staffing plan in the Facility Assessment, and several staff stated resident's care and resident's meals were delayed when they were short staffed, 2)… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Feb 27, 2025

    Based on observation and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 2/20/25 to 2/27/25, the facility did not ensure specific food items were maintained in accordance with professional standards for food safety and infection control prevention. Specifically, opened and not dated potentially hazardous foods were observed in one of the refrigerators and the dry pantry, and 3 of 4 dietary aides were observed wearing disposable gloves for meal service and did not change gloves after touching other non-meal service objects. The findings are: The facility policy last revised on 1/2025, 'Production, Purchasing, Storage: Food and Supply Storage' included documentation procedure to cover, label and date unused portions and open packages, using Medvantage/Freshdate labeling system. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Jan 29, 2025

    Based on record reviews and interviews, conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00355382 and NY00362103), the facility did not provide adequate supervision/monitoring to prevent accidents for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #1 and #3) reviewed. Specifically, on 9/3/2024 Resident reported they were bumped by the elevator door [NAME] exiting and reported pain 3 out of 10 to their right hip. 2) On 9/30/2024 while exiting the core elevator on the 4th floor, the elevator door closed hitting Resident #1's right hip causing pain and discomfort. 2) On 11/25/2024, Resident #3 was found inside of the facility housekeeping closet on the 4th floor. Facility investigation revealed the housekeeping door was unsecure due to the striker plate being broken. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF686Mar 29, 2024

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 3/13/24 to 3/29/24, the facility did not ensure 4 of 6 residents (Residents #432, #218, #48, and #54,) reviewed for pressure ulcers, received care and services to promote healing and to prevent new pressure ulcers from developing. Specifically, (1) Resident #432 acquired a stage 4 sacral pressure ulcer at facility and treatments were not completed as ordered. (2) Resident #218 was observed 4 times without a pillow under their right elbow and their right elbow stage 4 pressure ulcer had re-opened, (3) Resident #48 was admitted with moisture associated skin damage to the right sacrum which developed into an deep tissue injury and an unstageable wound, and (4) Resident #54's sacral pressure… […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 81 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Nov 14, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 27, 2025Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Jan 29, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 29, 2024Standard and complaint17 findings
  • Aug 22, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 14, 2023Complaint4 findings
  • Mar 25, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 20, 2021Standard5 findings
Show the 11 earlier surveys
  • Sep 9, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 6, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 12, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Sep 12, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Jul 11, 2016Standard2 findings
  • May 4, 2015Standard1 finding
  • May 14, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Aug 23, 2013—12 findings
  • Oct 11, 2011—7 findings
  • Apr 27, 2011—6 findings · 6 harm
  • Sep 29, 2010—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction