Deficiency Index

Falcon Lake Nursing Home, LLC

Zapata, Texas · CCN 676214

31 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
139
Surveys
31
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file23/31

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
59
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Zapata · rural
Medicare-certified since
2009

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
4
Staffing
2
Quality measures
1

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 75 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

Mar 17, 2026

237 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.263.40
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.49—
Annual nurse turnover41.7%50.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1794.4%E—F15.6%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 18 of the 139 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F6412×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6271×

    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Falcon Lake Nursing Home, LLC, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 18, 2024

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen and 1of 2 unit (unit 1) nutrition refrigerators reviewed for sanitation. The facility failed to maintain the kitchen freezer that had a large section of ice build-up in it. The facility failed to provide clean coffee cups for the resident's use. The facility failed to ensure the nutrition room refrigerator had labeled and dated items in them. The facility failed to ensure the nutrition room did not have expired items. The facility failed to ensure the nutrition room snack tray items were labeled, dated, and refrigerated. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF882Mar 5, 2021

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate an Infection Preventionist that was qualified by education, training, experience or certification, and who completed specialized training in infection prevention and control, for one of one Infection Preventionist reviewed. The designated Infection Control Preventionist (ICP/DON) had not completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. This failure could place residents at risk of cross contamination and infection. Findings included: During an interview on 03/03/21 at 8:40 a.m., the Administrator said the DON was the facility's the Infection Control Preventionists. The Administrator stated the DON and ADON were completed the infection control surveillance and logs. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF727Feb 4, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure RN coverage eight hours a day: [DATE] Nursing coverage schedule shows (4) weekend days without RN coverage January 2022 Nursing coverage schedule shows (9) days without RN coverage February 2022 Nursing coverage schedule shows (8) days without RN coverage This failure could place residents at risk for unmet nursing services. Findings included: Record review of Nursing schedule for [NAME] Lake indicated there was no RN scheduled to work on the weekends 2/5/2022, 2/6/2022, 2/12/2022, 2/13/2022, 2/19/2022, 2/20/2022, 2/26/2022, 2/27/2022 in February 2022. Nursing schedule for January 2022 indicated an RN worked one weekend day, 1/22/2022, out of ten weekend days for the month. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Feb 4, 2022

    Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in that: Kitchen staff failed to maintain temperature logs of the dishwasher. Kitchen staff failed to ensure dishwasher temperatures were maintained for proper sanitization. Kitchen staff failed to keep the ice maker clean to prevent potential foodborne illness. Kitchen staff failed to keep the water wells of the steam table clean to prevent potential foodborne illness. These deficient practices could affect the 25 residents receiving their meals prepared from the kitchen by putting them at risk for foodborne illnesses. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF693Mar 5, 2021

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who were fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #16, Resident #18, and Resident #19) reviewed for enteral nutrition. The facility failed to ensure staff labeled formula solution bags with the time the formula was started and initials of the nurses who hung the feeding, for Resident #16, Resident #18, and Resident #19. This failure could place residents at increased risk of complications related to enteral feeding. Findings Included: 1) Record review of Resident #16's Admission Record indicated Resident #16 was a [AGE] year-old female who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 139 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 17, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 30, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 7, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 28, 2025Standard7 findings
  • Jul 26, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 14, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 18, 2024Standard3 findings
  • Apr 20, 2023Standard2 findings
Show the 23 earlier surveys
  • Feb 4, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 5, 2021Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Jan 14, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 29, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 16, 2019Complaint6 findings
  • Sep 7, 2019Complaint5 findings
  • May 30, 2019Standard13 findings
  • Oct 3, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 25, 2018Standard4 findings
  • Apr 6, 2017Standard and complaint16 findings
  • Nov 8, 2016Complaint7 findings
  • Sep 23, 2016Complaint5 findings
  • May 12, 2016Complaint6 findings
  • Mar 19, 2016Complaint4 findings
  • Feb 24, 2016Standard21 findings
  • Dec 12, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 18, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 29, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 4, 2015Standard10 findings
  • Feb 5, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Jun 11, 2013—2 findings
  • Jan 24, 2013—2 findings
  • Jan 21, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction