Deficiency Index

Evansville Manor Nursing and Rehab, LLC

Evansville, Wisconsin · CCN 525418

39 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
168
Surveys
39
Harm or worse
23
Immediate jeopardy
10
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy10

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. 1 of these were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file30/39

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
71
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
EDEN SENIOR CARE
County
Rock
Medicare-certified since
1988

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 51 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Wisconsin.

Last survey on record

Mar 26, 2026

228 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.653.71
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.72—
Annual nurse turnover60.3%44.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$208,709 across 7 penalties
Payment denials
1
Special focus
SFF Candidate
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ35.5%K—L23.6%
Actual harmG59.1%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3461.8%E814.5%F35.5%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 55 of the 168 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6846×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6094×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6104×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

  • F5843×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6003×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Evansville Manor Nursing and Rehab, LLC, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF812Feb 25, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This has the potential to affect all 61 residents. Kitchen staff were not testing the parts per million (PPM) of the chemical sanitizing solution in the low temperature dishwasher during a Norovirus (a contagious virus which causes nausea, vomiting and diarrhea) outbreak.In addition, on 2/4/26 DA I (Dietary Aide) was out with GI (gastrointestinal) illness symptoms. According to CDC (Center for Disease Control and Prevention) DA I should have been removed from work until 48 hours after DA I's last symptom/episode. DA I was allowed to return to work too early after the onset of GI symptoms and prepare food. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF880Feb 25, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections. This has the potential to affect all 61 residents.The facility failed to follow infection control standards of practice and procedures.The facility failed to maintain accurate and up to date outbreak line listings for staff and residents. Staff were allowed to return to work early after the onset of GI (Gastrointestinal Illness) symptoms.The facility failed to ensure residents experiencing GI symptoms were put into precautions timely. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Mar 26, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual abuse for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (R1). R2 has a history of making inappropriate comments and inappropriately touching female residents and staff. R2 is care planned to be kept out of arms reach of female residents and to be monitored when out in common areas. On 2/27/26, R2 was left unsupervised and inappropriately touched R1.The facility's failure to provide adequate supervision and protect residents from sexual abuse created a reasonable likelihood for serious psychosocial harm, thus resulting in a finding of immediate jeopardy (IJ) that began on 2/27/26. Surveyor notified NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) of the immediate jeopardy on 3/12/26 at 12:00 PM. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Oct 3, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 resident (R56) reviewed for wandering and elopement potential. R56 has dementia and mild intellectual disabilities and has an Activated Power of Attorney for Health Care (APOAHC). R56 eloped from the facility on 8/5/24. The facility did not have adequate supervision to ensure they were aware of R56's whereabouts and did not have security measures and monitoring in place to ensure R56 could not access various locations in the building. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Feb 5, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that each staff implemented proper safety interventions as directed by a resident's plan of care and did not ensure residents were free from accidents and hazards for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for falls. On [DATE], a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) attempted to provide care to R1 without maintaining the proper safety interventions as directed in R1's care plan. R1 rolled off the bed, falling approximately 2 feet and hitting his head. Facility staff picked up R1 off the floor and placed him in bed before the Registered Nurse (RN) could arrive on the scene to assess R1 for possible injuries. R1 was sent to the hospital where he was found to have suffered a fractured neck, resulting in his death. […]

Read 38 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 38 of 168 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 26, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 25, 2026Standard and complaint14 findings · 3 harm
  • Dec 4, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Sep 17, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 18, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • May 15, 2025Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 3, 2024Standard and complaint16 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 5, 2024Complaint5 findings · 2 harm
Show the 31 earlier surveys
  • Jun 29, 2023Standard and complaint8 findings
  • May 9, 2023Complaint9 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 18, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 21, 2022Standard6 findings
  • Feb 15, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 11, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 2, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 24, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jun 2, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 16, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 11, 2021Standard and complaint6 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 7, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jun 29, 2020Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
  • Jun 17, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Mar 19, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 9, 2020Complaint8 findings · 3 harm
  • Oct 14, 2019Complaint5 findings
  • Jul 30, 2019Complaint7 findings
  • Mar 12, 2019Standard6 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 26, 2018Complaint6 findings
  • Dec 1, 2017Standard and complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 5, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 11, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Aug 27, 2015Standard9 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 31, 2014Standard5 findings
  • Jan 8, 2014—1 finding
  • Oct 23, 2013—5 findings
  • Aug 14, 2013—1 finding
  • Oct 23, 2012—1 finding
  • Aug 14, 2012—7 findings
  • Jun 15, 2011—5 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction