Eskridge Care and Rehab
Eskridge, Kansas · CCN 175455
22 surveys since 2011, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 122
- Surveys
- 22
- Harm or worse
- 8
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 5
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 60
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES
- County
- Wabaunsee
- Medicare-certified since
- 2002
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 108 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Kansas.
Last survey on record
Apr 22, 2026
201 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 2.41 | 3.78 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.48 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 48.8% | 50.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $13,397 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J14.0% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1456.0% | E416.0% | F520.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C14.0% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5842×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6902×
Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
- F5821×
Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Eskridge Care and Rehab, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF602Mar 12, 2021
The facility reported a census of 57 residents and reported handling personal funds accounts for all residents of the facility. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to protect at least 54 residents (50 residents' individual envelopes of cash found and four individual discharged residents' envelopes found with cash , Residents (R)10, R11, R12, and R13), from misappropriation of their money. This happened when Activity Director (AD) Z, the alleged perpetrator (AP), kept resident funds entrusted to her, under the understanding she would use the funds to purchase personal items for residents, from at least [DATE] (with stimulus money obtained) through [DATE]. AD Z accumulated approximately $13,000 in cash that she kept at her home without the residents' knowledge. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF806Feb 26, 2024
The facility identified a census of 57 residents, with three residents reviewed for food allergies. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to accommodate R1's known food allergy to mushrooms which caused anaphylactic (severe life-threatening allergic reaction) allergic reaction. The facility failed to follow R1's dietary care plan, when staff served R1 facility food (oriental vegetables) for lunch, that contained mushrooms. R1 advised Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M her mouth and throat were itching, and she was severely allergic to mushrooms. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 22, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions to prevent the potential for food borne bacteria.Findings included:- During an initial tour of the kitchen on 04/20/26 at 07:41 AM, the following areas of concern were noted:1. The door handles of the oven had food debris.2. The can rack holding one-gallon cans had a build-up of food debris on the runners.3. The bottom shelf of the preparation table had a build-up of food debris.4. A three-drawered plastic storage container had a build-up of dried-on liquids and a white substance.5. The cart holding the facility ice chest had a scattered white substance and dried-on fluids.6. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Feb 24, 2025
The facility had a census of 58 residents. The sample included 16 residents. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food at the required serving temperature. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk of unpalatable food and food-borne illness. Findings included: - On 02/20/25 at 11:43 AM, Dietary Staff (DS) CC prepared to serve the noon meal. DS BB took the serving temperature check which revealed the pureed turkey temperature of 110 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and the pureed corn of 115 degrees F. DS CC reported he did not know what the holding/serving temperature of the hot food was. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF868Feb 24, 2025
The facility had a census of 58 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to retain evidence of the required Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) members attended meetings at least quarterly, which placed residents at risk of unidentified quality care services. This placed the residents who resided in the facility at risk for decreased quality of care. Findings included: - Upon request, the facility failed to provide the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting attendance sheets for the past year. On 02/24/25 at 01:30 PM, Administrative Staff A stated the facility could not find QAA or QAPI meeting sign-in sheets from 2024. […]
Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 122 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 22, 2026Standard6 findings
- Feb 24, 2025Standard and complaint11 findings
- Feb 26, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 27, 2023Complaint1 finding
- May 11, 2023Standard and complaint6 findings
- May 12, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Sep 30, 2021Standard11 findings
- Mar 12, 2021Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
Show the 14 earlier surveys
- Nov 24, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Feb 4, 2020Standard4 findings
- Jan 15, 2019Standard and complaint15 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 14, 2017Standard and complaint12 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 5, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 4, 2017Complaint7 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 19, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Feb 23, 2016Standard and complaint6 findings
- Dec 10, 2014Standard and complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 21, 2013—6 findings
- May 2, 2012—6 findings
- Aug 24, 2011—2 findings
- Jan 27, 2011—13 findings
- Jan 5, 2011—4 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction