Emerald Care
Wapato, Washington · CCN 505265
43 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 146
- Surveys
- 43
- Harm or worse
- 13
- Immediate jeopardy
- 5
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 82
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Yakima
- Medicare-certified since
- 1982
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 59 facilities of 66–99 beds in Washington.
Last survey on record
Mar 24, 2026
230 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.98 | 4.80 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.80 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 46.3% | 32.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,278 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G14.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1252.2% | E730.4% | F313.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6102×
Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5581×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
- F6071×
Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Emerald Care, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF880Jun 14, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to carry out key components of an effective infection prevention/control program by implementing transmission-based precautions (TBP, safeguards to prevent spread of diseases) and use of full personal protective equipment (PPE) in protecting the safety/well-being for two of two residents (270, 72) not vaccinated against COVID-19 (a highly contagious virus) with one resident who received an aerosol-generating procedure (AGP, procedure that may generate potentially infectious particles into the air). […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF695Jun 14, 2021
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure and provide consistent, appropriate [CONDITION(S)]/airway stoma care (a tube or opening made in the neck to help with breathing) and [CONDITION(S)] suctioning (a process that uses a small tube hooked to suction and clear fluid buildup) in accordance with professional standards of practice for two of three residents (270 and 50), reviewed for respiratory care. This failure placed the residents at increased risk for negative outcomes, including secretion build up, respiratory infections, and airway trauma. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF726Jun 14, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses had the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs in the area of [CONDITION(S)]/airway stoma sites (a tube or opening made in neck to help with breathing). This failure resulted in the lack of provision of care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent negative outcomes, and placed two of two residents (270, 50) at an increased risk for respiratory infections, ineffective [CONDITION(S)] suctioning (a process that uses a small tube hooked to suction and clear fluid buildup within an airway), airway trauma and [CONDITION(S)] (low oxygen in your body). […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Mar 24, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide hot liquids at a safe drinking temperature for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for accident hazards. Resident 1 experienced harm in which they sustained burns on their right thigh from hot coffee. This failed practice placed the residents at risk for burn injuries, pain, and adverse health conditions.Findings included. Review of a policy titled, Free of Hazards/Supervision and Devices, dated 02/2025, showed the facility would ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent avoidable accidents and injuries. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF558Jun 14, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of two residents (63), reviewed for quality of life, received necessary interventions to alleviate her distress and maintain her dignity and well-being. This failure caused psychosocial harm to Resident 63 when the facility failed to ensure her need for an environment free from distractions and rather she remained in a room where her roommate's yelling, moaning and outbursts created an environment of agitation and distress for her. Findings included . Resident 63. Review of the [DATE] comprehensive assessment showed the resident readmitted on [DATE] and required extensive assistance and was dependant on staff for all care needs. […]
Read 32 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 32 of 146 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 24, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 30, 2026Standard and complaint13 findings
- Feb 4, 2025Standard5 findings
- Sep 11, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Mar 5, 2024Standard3 findings
- Mar 15, 2023Standard10 findings
- Jun 14, 2021Standard and complaint13 findings · 4 harm
- Jan 15, 2021Complaint1 finding
Show the 35 earlier surveys
- Aug 28, 2019Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 1, 2019Complaint3 findings
- May 22, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Mar 28, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Feb 15, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Feb 7, 2019Standard13 findings
- Jan 18, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Aug 28, 2018Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 18, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Apr 23, 2018Standard and complaint11 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 25, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Jul 25, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jun 29, 2017Standard and complaint10 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 23, 2017Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 21, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Oct 31, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Sep 29, 2016Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 25, 2016Standard2 findings
- Feb 24, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Jan 8, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Nov 16, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Oct 15, 2015Standard6 findings
- Jan 14, 2015Complaint6 findings · 2 harm
- Aug 11, 2014Standard1 finding
- Nov 1, 2013—4 findings
- Jun 7, 2013—1 finding
- Jun 22, 2012—2 findings
- Feb 14, 2012—2 findings
- Jun 13, 2011—1 finding
- May 4, 2011—6 findings
- Apr 6, 2011—1 finding
- Mar 7, 2011—1 finding
- Feb 16, 2011—2 findings
- Oct 18, 2010—1 finding
- Sep 14, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction