Deficiency Index

Embassy of Woodland Park

Orbisonia, Pennsylvania · CCN 395697

36 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
204
Surveys
36
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse3

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file24/36

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
125
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
EMBASSY HEALTHCARE
County
Huntingdon · rural
Medicare-certified since
1985

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 132 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Pennsylvania.

Last survey on record

Jul 30, 2026

102 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.473.42
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.34—
Annual nurse turnover29.6%47.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$8,155 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG11.9%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD4279.2%E917.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B11.9%C—
CMS’s current file: 53 of the 204 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5843×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F7613×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Embassy of Woodland Park, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 10, 2024

    Based on a review of manufacturer's directions, clinical records, incident/accident reports, staff training records, and information submitted by the facility, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that safe techniques were used during a transfer onto a mechanical wheelchair lift for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 2), resulting in a head injury. Findings include: Manufacturer's directions for use of the [NAME] Corporation FMVSS Public Use Lift (the type of lift platform in the facility's wheelchair van), undated, indicated that the lift platform must be positioned at floor level when loading and unloading in and out of the vehicle. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF675Jul 30, 2026

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as resident interviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided appropriately fitting incontinence products for three of 11 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 4, 11).Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated July 9, 2026, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, dependent on two staff for daily care needs including toileting, was frequently incontinent of urine, and weighed 414 pounds. The resident's care plan, dated July 28, 2026, revealed that the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter (tube inserted directly into the bladder for urine drainage). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF552Dec 4, 2025

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to inform the resident and/or resident representative in advance of the risks and benefits of psychotropic medication (medications that affect the persons mental state, emotions and behavior) use and the treatment alternatives prior to initiating the administration of the medication for five of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 8, 10, 11, 19 and 68). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Dec 4, 2025

    Based on facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.Findings include:Observations of the walk in cooler on December 1, 2025, at 9:50 a.m. and December 3, 2025 at 1:43 p.m. respectively, revealed a shelving unit with an opened box of eggs and a box containing cartons of liquid eggs being stored on the bottom shelf, which was approximately 1.0 to 1.5 inches off the ground. On the floor beneath the shelving unit was debris including individual butter containers and brown onion skins.Interview with the Dietary Director on December 3, 2025, at 1:43 p.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF803Oct 3, 2024

    Based on a review of facility policy and the facility's written menus, as well as observations and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their planned menu. Findings include: A facility policy, dated March 15, 2024, indicated that menus shall be written in advance and followed. Any menu substitutions shall be made in an emergency situation only and recorded on the substitution log. An interview with a group of residents on October 1, 2024, indicated that the kitchen does not always serve what is on the menu. Observations of the kitchen on September 30, 2024, at 9:58 a.m. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 204 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 30, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 23, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 8, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 4, 2025Standard11 findings
  • Aug 19, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 7, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 1, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 3, 2024Standard13 findings
Show the 28 earlier surveys
  • Jul 10, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 30, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 29, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 30, 2023Standard and complaint18 findings
  • Jan 11, 2023Standard and complaint15 findings
  • Dec 22, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 27, 2022Standard12 findings
  • Jun 24, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • May 17, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Sep 29, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 21, 2020Standard11 findings
  • Nov 18, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 19, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 22, 2019Complaint17 findings
  • Jan 10, 2019Standard20 findings
  • Feb 9, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 5, 2018Standard and complaint11 findings
  • Jan 26, 2017Standard12 findings
  • Nov 17, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 7, 2016Complaint3 findings
  • Sep 21, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 10, 2015Standard19 findings
  • Jan 15, 2015Standard5 findings
  • Jan 15, 2014—2 findings
  • Dec 5, 2013—4 findings
  • Jun 20, 2013—1 finding
  • Jan 10, 2013—4 findings
  • Dec 8, 2011—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction