Elon Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Tampa, Florida · CCN 105725
27 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2026.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 98
- Surveys
- 27
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 96
- Ownership
- For profit - Individual
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Hillsborough
- Medicare-certified since
- 1991
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 56 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Florida.
Last survey on record
Apr 2, 2026
221 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.48 | 3.65 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.91 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 30.3% | 40.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $30,989 across 3 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G13.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1763.0% | E829.6% | F13.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5842×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6452×
PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
- F7612×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5541×
Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Elon Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF561Apr 2, 2026
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate one (1) of one (1) resident's choice to close the room door at night for privacy and personal comfort (Resident #39); and two (2) of two (2) residents right to use electric wheelchairs to support mobility, independence, and the resident's highest practicable level of functioning (Resident #s 44 and 96). This failure caused Resident #44 frustration, anxiety, mental anguish, and self-isolation, which resulted in psychological harm.The findings include:1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Dec 21, 2023
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager met the mandatory minimum qualifications for the Dietary Manager position. Findings included: Review of the Dietary Manager's qualifications revealed the Dietary Manager (DM) was not [Food Certification Service] qualified and was not certified as a dietary or food service manager. During an interview on 12/20/23 at 11:09 a.m., The Dietary Manager (DM) stated I have been working as the Dietary Supervisor for three months now. The DM stated prior to being DM, I was a cook here since 2016. The DM stated she did not have an associate degree in food service or hospitality, and was not certified in food management but was working on obtaining the [Food Certification Service] certification. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Feb 25, 2026
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed related to: 1) staff performing hand hygiene when completing medication administration, 2) cleaning of multi-use equipment, such as blood glucose monitors and blood pressure cuffs, in between uses on residents, and 3) an uncleanable surface in one of two resident shower rooms in the one west unit. Findings included: 1. On 2/23/26 at 9:20 a.m. during medication administration observation Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) used her fingers to place vitamin D-3, aspirin, Iron, and sodium chloride pills into a medication cup to administer to Resident #62. On 2/23/26 at approximately 9:23 a.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF924Feb 25, 2026
Based on observations, facility record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure handrails were affixed to the wall in a safe and secure manner in two floors (200 and 100) of two floors observed, during three days (2/22/2026, 2/23/2026, and 2/24/2026) of four days observed. Findings included: During a facility wide tour on 2/22/2026 at 9:15 a.m., at 2:00 p.m. and on 9/23/2026 at 8:30 a.m., the following was observed: 1. The 2nd floor hallway handrail located before the shower room was not affixed tightly to the wall. 2. The 2nd floor hallway handrail located across from the nurse station and below the mirror and clock was not affixed tightly to the wall. 3. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF568Feb 19, 2025
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement an accurate and up to date system for the accounting of residents' personal funds entrusted to the facility for three (#3, #5, and #6) of three residents sampled for resident funds review. Findings included: Review of accounts records for Resident's #3, #5 and #6 showed the residents' cost of care being withdrawn from their personal funds account did not consistently match what the Medicaid Access eligibility had determined, and Social Security direct deposits for January and February 2025 were not reflected in the accounts. On 02/19/2025 at 10:23 a.m. Resident #6 was observed in her room and she agreed to an interview. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 98 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 2, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 25, 2026Standard8 findings
- Feb 19, 2025Complaint4 findings
- Dec 21, 2023Standard and complaint10 findings
- Jul 5, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jan 19, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Sep 16, 2021Standard4 findings
- May 17, 2021Complaint1 finding
Show the 19 earlier surveys
- Sep 15, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Aug 26, 2020Infection control4 findings
- Apr 27, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jan 16, 2020Standard4 findings
- Sep 28, 2018Standard and complaint11 findings
- Jul 13, 2018Complaint1 finding
- May 24, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Nov 15, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Aug 24, 2017Standard12 findings
- Aug 26, 2016Standard4 findings
- Aug 3, 2015Complaint3 findings
- May 1, 2015Standard2 findings
- Nov 5, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Jan 16, 2014—5 findings
- Sep 12, 2013—3 findings
- Oct 19, 2012—4 findings
- Jul 30, 2012—3 findings
- Feb 1, 2012—2 findings
- Sep 2, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction