Deficiency Index

Elderwood at Ticonderoga

Ticonderoga, New York · CCN 335482

14 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
73
Surveys
14
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file10/14

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
84
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
ELDERWOOD
County
Essex · rural
Medicare-certified since
1976

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=17, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Aug 20, 2025

446 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.013.27
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.61—
Annual nurse turnover48.6%53.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$4,516 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1866.7%E518.5%F27.4%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C27.4%
CMS’s current file: 27 of the 73 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6922×

    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Elderwood at Ticonderoga, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF692Jul 15, 2024

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure the provision of nutritional and hydration care and services to each resident, consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment, therapeutic diet, and preferences for 4 (Residents #3, #23, #24 and #63) of 5 residents reviewed. Specifically, Residents #3, #23, and #63 were not monitored for weight loss, assessed when significant weight loss occurred, and did not receive correct meals consistent with physician ordered diets and recommendations for meal/caloric intake. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF805Jul 15, 2024

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure food was prepared in a form designed to meet the individual needs for 5 of 5 residents (Residents #3, #10, #23, #35, and #48) reviewed for diet consistency. Specifically, the Resident #3, #10, #23, #35, and #48 received meals that were not consistent with their physician ordered diets. This is evidenced by: Cross-referenced to F692: Nutrition/Hydration The facility policy, Nutrition and Hydration Needs, last revised 7/19/2018, documented the Registered Dietitian or Diet Technician would assess the nutritional needs of each resident upon admission and as needed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF804Jul 15, 2024

    Based on record review, observation, and interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure each resident received food and drink that was palatable, flavorful, and at an appetizing temperature for 2 of 2 test trays (the 7/09/2024 and 7/10/2024 lunch meals) reviewed. Specifically, food and beverages served to residents for the 7/09/2024 and 7/10/2024 lunch meals on the Adirondack and Patriot main Dining Room were not palatable. Additionally, multiple residents complained of food palatability during the monthly facility Food Forum meetings. This was evidenced by: Food Forum Meeting documentation included the following concerns: - On 5/06/2024 all residents in attendance stated the soups lacked consistency. Some items such as rice, pork chops, and chicken were dry. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Sep 23, 2021

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not maintain food preparation areas in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Food preparation and serving areas and equipment are to be kept clean, and a test kit is to be provided to measure the parts per million (ppm) concentration of the solution used to sanitize equipment. Specifically, food contact equipment in the main kitchen and 3 of 3 kitchenettes were not clean, and an accurate test kit was not provided. This is evidenced as follows. The main kitchen and the kitchenettes were inspected on 09/19/2021 at 10:24 AM. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF580Aug 20, 2025

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (Case #2577186), the facility did not ensure they immediately consulted with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in condition for one (1) (Residents #1) of one (1) resident reviewed for significant changes. Specifically, for Resident #1 the physician was not notified that the resident had pulled out the urinary catheter. This is evidenced by:The Facility's Policy and Procedure titled, Change in Resident Condition Assessment, last modified 4/12/2018, documented; A change of condition is defined as a major change in the resident's status that: 1. Is not self-limiting. 2. Impacts one or more areas of health status. 3. Requires review/revision of the care plan. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 73 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 20, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 15, 2024Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Feb 3, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 23, 2021Standard5 findings
  • Apr 26, 2019Standard11 findings
  • Jul 28, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Jul 24, 2017Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 28, 2016Standard and complaint5 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
  • Apr 23, 2015Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Mar 18, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 27, 2014—5 findings
  • Mar 28, 2013—10 findings
  • May 17, 2012—15 findings
  • Apr 28, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction