Edgewood Manor of Lucasville II

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Edgewood Manor of Lucasville II, in the surveyor’s own words.

• Actual harm, isolatedF684Sep 7, 2021

  Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure treatment for [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Actual harm occurred on 06/16/21 when Resident #65 was admitted to the hospital and diagnosed with [CONDITION(S)] (inflammation of bone or bone marrow, usually due to infection) of the second left toe had to have the second left toe amputated. treatment for [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . This affected two residents (#59 and #65) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization and/or skin conditions. Findings Include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

• Actual harm, isolatedF692Sep 7, 2021

  Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide nutritional interventions, including timely and adequate assistance with meals to Resident #65 to prevent weight loss. Actual harm occurred when Resident #65, who was dependent on staff for eating and assessed to sustain a 20.9% severe weight loss in 180 days (on 02/12/21 the resident weighed 240.6 pounds and on 08/10/21 the resident weighed 190.2 pounds loss of 50.4 pounds in 180 days) did not receive adequate or timely assistance with meals on 08/30/21 and 09/01/21. This affected one resident (#65) of four residents reviewed for weight loss. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

• Actual harm, isolatedF791Sep 7, 2021

  Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure timely dental services were provided for Resident #9 and Resident #65. Actual harm occurred on 09/02/21 when Resident #65, who had been referred for tooth extraction (on 04/27/21) was assessed to have an infected tooth which required antibiotic treatment. The facility failed to ensure a follow up appointment for the extraction was completed timely after the need for the extraction was identified on 04/27/21 resulting in the resident developing an infection. This affected two residents (#9 and #65) of the three residents reviewed for dental services. Findings Include: 1. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF921Jun 18, 2025

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure privacy curtains were in place around commodes in the communal bathroom for residents to utilize for privacy when toileting. This had the potential to affect the 22 residents (#1, #2, #5, #6, #9, #14, #17, #18, #19, #22, #26, #27, #33, #34, #35, #36, #38, #39, #45, #54, #59, and #64) who resided on the 300 hall and 400 hall and were identified by the facility as utilizing the communal bathrooms. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Observation on 06/17/25 at 10:30 A.M. revealed residents residing on the 300 hall did not have private bathrooms present in their rooms and had to utilize a communal bathroom for toileting. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF800Sep 7, 2021

  Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the correct diet that met resident needs was provided when whole broccoli florets were given to residents on a dysphagia advanced diet instead of chopped broccoli. This had the potential to affect 18 residents (#5, #8, #14, #16, #17, #28, #33, #37, #38, #39, #44, #45, #48, #54, #58, #60, #63 and #268) of 18 residents identified to have orders for a dysphagia advanced diet. The facility census was 69. Findings Include: On 08/31/21 from 11:25 A.M. to 12:10 P.M. observation of the lunch meal service revealed two available vegetable options puree broccoli and regular broccoli florets. […]