Deficiency Index

Bath Creek Estates

Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio · CCN 366403

21 surveys since 2013, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
50
Surveys
21
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2013–2026
’13’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/21

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
99
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP
County
Summit
Medicare-certified since
2013

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 391 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Ohio.

Last survey on record

Mar 26, 2026

228 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.623.47
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.61—
Annual nurse turnover54.2%49.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1381.3%E318.8%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 16 of the 50 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5582×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F6772×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F5851×

    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.

  • F6001×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6561×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Bath Creek Estates, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF886Mar 5, 2021

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all agency staff working in the facility were tested and had documented results of negative COVID-19 status prior to working with residents per Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidance. In addition, the facility failed to ensure all facility staff were tested twice a week per CMS QSO memo NH-20-38. The facility's systemic failure of allowing agency staff with an unknown COVID-19 status to provide resident care increased the likelihood of transmission of COVID-19 which can lead to serious illness and death to any of the 82 residents in the facility who were at risk for contracting COVID-19. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 6, 2026

    Based on observations, interviews and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary kitchen and that food was labeled properly. This had the potential to affect 82 out of 83 residents who ate meals in the facility's kitchen, as one resident (Resident #36) received enteral nutrition. The facility census was 83.Observation and interview on 07/27/26 at 8:37 A.M. to 9:09 A.M. of initial tour of the kitchen with Food & Nutrition Services Director (FNSD) #525 revealed three rotted tomatoes in the refrigerator. The follow items were undated and unlabeled: a packet of opened Swiss cheese, an open packet of ham, and a cut cucumber and tomato that were wrapped in cellophane. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Mar 5, 2021

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to have an effective Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) to prevent the potential transmission of infections including COVID-19 within the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1.ensure all staff were screened and documented the absence of signs/symptoms of COVID-19; 2. clean the surface of a bedside table before placing a glucometer on it for one of two residents (Resident (R) 2) observed during finger stick blood sugar testing; 3. perform proper hand hygiene for one of five sampled residents (R1); and, 4. properly store a nebulizer mask. The facility's failures had the potential to affect all 82 residents who resided in the facility at the time of the survey. Findings include: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF885Mar 5, 2021

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide weekly cumulative updates of number of staff and residents positive for COVID-19 to residents, their representatives, and families. This failure had the potential to affect all 82 residents who resided at the facility at the time of the survey. Findings include: Review of the QSO-20-29-NH Memo, dated 05/06/20, revealed, The facility must - Inform residents, their representatives, and families of those residing in facilities . (iii) Include any cumulative updates for residents, their representatives, and families at least weekly or by 5 p.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF558Mar 18, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure emergency call devices/call lights were within reach of Resident #12, #16, #20, #23 and #64. This affected five residents (#12, #16, #20, #23, #64, ) out of seven residents reviewed for emergency call devices within reach. The facility census was 94. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified fall, wedge compression fracture of fifth lumbar vertebra, history of falling, severe protein calorie malnutrition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), osteolysis , and secondary malignant neoplasm (cancer) of bone. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 50 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 6, 2026Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Mar 26, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 20, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 18, 2025Complaint5 findings
  • Jan 21, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 21, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Sep 18, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 28, 2023Complaint1 finding
Show the 13 earlier surveys
  • May 4, 2021Standard3 findings
  • Mar 5, 2021Infection control4 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 7, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Apr 10, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 19, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 21, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Sep 29, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Jul 30, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Apr 16, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 12, 2014Standard3 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 11, 2014Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 17, 2013—3 findings
  • Sep 26, 2013—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction