Edgemere Estates
El Paso, Texas · CCN 675831
38 surveys since 2011, 14 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 176
- Surveys
- 38
- Harm or worse
- 14
- Immediate jeopardy
- 7
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. 1 of these were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 138
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- El Paso
- Medicare-certified since
- 2000
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 209 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
Jun 3, 2026
159 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.34 | 3.26 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.37 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 52.6% | 55.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $49,292 across 3 penalties
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J34.2% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G11.4% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3346.5% | E3042.3% | F11.4% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B11.4% | C22.8% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6898×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6564×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F7554×
Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
- F8424×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F6553×
Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Edgemere Estates, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jul 19, 2024
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible for 2 (Resident #2 and #3) of 6 residents reviewed for vehicle safety. -Maintenance Director failed to ensure Resident #2 and #3 were secured in the vehicle on 06/17/2024, while transporting residents back to the facility from dialysis visit, which resulted in falls with injuries. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 06/17/2024 and ended on 06/18/2024. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Apr 1, 2024
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents in the facility were free from neglect for 1 (Resident #1) of 14 residents reviewed for neglect in that: Resident #1 was found unresponsive on [DATE] around 7:25 AM by CNA C who immediately notified RN A. RN A who was responsible for Resident #1 did not know the process and procedures that were to be followed when a full-code resident was found unresponsive, resulting in the resident not being provided CPR. An IJ was identified on [DATE] at 10:25 AM. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 10:25 AM. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF678Apr 1, 2024
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure personnel provided basic life support, including CPR, to a resident requiring such emergency care prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel and subject to related physician orders and the resident's advance directives for 1 (Resident #1) of 14 residents reviewed for physician's orders for provision of basic life support in that: Resident #1 was found unresponsive on [DATE] around 7:25 AM by CNA C who immediately notified RN A. RN A went to the resident's room and checked him for signs of life but did not know how to respond when she did not find a pulse, and did not immediately start CPR or other life-sustaining measures, resulting in Resident #1's wishes to be resuscitated not being honored. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Mar 14, 2024
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible for1 (Resident #37) of 21 residents reviewed for an environment free of accident hazards as possible. The facility failed to ensure that the mechanical lift (Hoyer) sling used to transfer Resident #37 was in good working order, resulting in a sling strap tearing, and Resident #37 falling to the floor. This failure could result in residents fearing transfers using a mechanical lift, and serious injury, including fractures. Findings included: Record review of Resident #37 ' s face sheet dated 03/14/2024 revealed he was [AGE] years old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF921Mar 14, 2024
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public in four of four halls reviewed for condition of handrails. The facility failed to ensure that the handrails throughout the facility did not have the paint worn off them. This failure could put residents at risk of feeling a decreased sense of well-being, and at increased risk for splinters because of the poorly maintained condition of the handrails. Findings included: Handrails: Observation on 03/14/2024 at 2:30 PM of the handrails in the 100 and 200 halls revealed that the brown paint on all handrails was worn through and that the wood showed through the paint. […]
Read 33 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 33 of 176 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 18, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Jun 3, 2026Standard4 findings
- Dec 16, 2025Complaint4 findings
- Apr 30, 2025Standard5 findings
- Feb 10, 2025Complaint6 findings
- Jan 31, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jan 2, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Sep 20, 2024Complaint3 findings
Show the 30 earlier surveys
- Jul 19, 2024Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- May 1, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Apr 1, 2024Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Mar 14, 2024Standard and complaint24 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 31, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Aug 8, 2023Complaint3 findings
- Jun 26, 2023Complaint3 findings
- Feb 10, 2023Standard12 findings
- Jul 27, 2022Complaint5 findings
- Apr 8, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Dec 17, 2021Standard7 findings
- Nov 23, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Aug 25, 2021Complaint3 findings
- Sep 25, 2020Standard3 findings
- Jun 25, 2019Standard5 findings
- Sep 20, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Jun 1, 2018Standard6 findings
- Mar 7, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Aug 14, 2017Standard and complaint15 findings · 3 harm
- Jul 29, 2016Standard14 findings
- Aug 7, 2015Standard8 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 21, 2014Standard1 finding
- Jun 25, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Oct 24, 2013—1 finding
- Aug 9, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 28, 2013Standard and complaint8 findings · 4 harm
- Feb 13, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 8, 2012—7 findings
- Jul 7, 2011—1 finding
- May 27, 2011—8 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction