Edenbrook of Appleton North
Appleton, Wisconsin · CCN 525484
41 surveys since 2011, 17 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 201
- Surveys
- 41
- Harm or worse
- 17
- Immediate jeopardy
- 7
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 95
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- EDEN SENIOR CARE
- County
- Outagamie
- Medicare-certified since
- 1992
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 51 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Wisconsin.
Last survey on record
Jun 17, 2026
145 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.93 | 3.71 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.08 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 38.9% | 44.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $13,540 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J14.5% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1672.7% | E29.1% | F14.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C29.1% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5511×
Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
- F5801×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F5831×
Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Edenbrook of Appleton North, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Mar 9, 2026
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision was provided for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 3 sampled residents at risk for wandering/elopement.R1 had a hsitory of elopement and WanderGuard (WG) removal (a device placed on a person to alert facility staff if the person is exiting an area unsupervised). Despite the fact that R1 removed the WG multipe times and exited the facility unsupervised, the facility failed to implement increased supervision for R1 or increased monitoring for WG placement. On 11/17/26 at approximately 10:00 PM, staff discovered R1 was not in the facility during rounds. R1 was last seen by staff in the dining room at approximately 9:45 PM. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF760Feb 21, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 Resident (R) (R3) of 5 residents was free of a significant medication error. R3 received in error clonidine (an antihypertensive medication,) losartan potassium (an antihypertensive medication,) and furosemide (a diuretic medication) which resulted in the need for intravenous (IV) (a needle or tube inserted into the vein) therapy to improve hypotension (low blood pressure). Findings include: R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's dementia, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], contained a Brief Interview for Mental status (BIMs) score of 13 out of 15 which indicated R3 had intact cognition. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 6, 2025
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe and sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect all 68 residents residing in the facility. The facility did not monitor and document food cooling temperatures. The walk-in cooler and dry storage area contained multiple undated and unlabeled items. The facility did not test Quaternary sanitizing solution used to sanitize food preparation areas in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Aug 6, 2025
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 4 residents (R) (R62, R1, R9, and R42) of 6 sampled residents. During an observation of pericare for R62, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-D did not appropriately remove gloves and cleanse hands.R1 was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). During an observation of catheter irrigation, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-G did not wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). Following the provision of care, staff did not remove PPE and complete hand hygiene when exiting R9's room.R42 had a history of chronic urinary tract infections (UTIs). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jun 30, 2025
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 72 residents (R) residing in the facility. Numerous supply carts for residents on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) contained expired sanitizing wipes and/or expired hand sanitizer. Findings include: The facility's Infection Control Program policy, dated [DATE], indicates: The infection control program exists to assure a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents and personnel. […]
Read 36 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 36 of 201 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 17, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Mar 9, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 2, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Aug 6, 2025Standard4 findings
- Jun 30, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Dec 13, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jun 12, 2024Standard and complaint6 findings
- Nov 13, 2023Complaint1 finding
Show the 33 earlier surveys
- May 24, 2023Standard4 findings
- Feb 21, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 6, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Jun 3, 2021Standard2 findings
- Feb 17, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Oct 26, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Aug 7, 2019Standard3 findings
- Oct 1, 2018Complaint3 findings
- Sep 13, 2018Complaint3 findings
- Jul 12, 2018Standard8 findings
- Mar 7, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Jul 31, 2017Complaint2 findings
- May 18, 2017Standard and complaint10 findings
- Jan 11, 2017Standard9 findings
- Oct 6, 2016Complaint6 findings · 4 harm
- Sep 13, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Jun 16, 2016Standard and complaint10 findings
- Nov 10, 2015Standard10 findings
- Aug 11, 2015Complaint1 finding
- May 21, 2015Complaint7 findings
- Mar 24, 2015Standard15 findings · 2 harm
- Feb 18, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Dec 22, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Apr 29, 2014Standard and complaint24 findings · 5 harm
- Feb 26, 2014—3 findings
- Oct 10, 2013—3 findings
- Apr 17, 2013—8 findings
- Apr 3, 2013—3 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 11, 2013—6 findings · 3 harm
- Apr 25, 2012—17 findings
- May 20, 2011—9 findings
- Apr 27, 2011—3 findings
- Apr 18, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction