Deficiency Index

Douglas Jacobson State Veterans Nursing Home

Port Charlotte, Florida · CCN 106059

18 surveys since 2011, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
55
Surveys
18
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse6

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file10/18

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
Government - State
Chain
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS' AFFAIRS
County
Charlotte
Medicare-certified since
2004

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
5
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 346 facilities of 100–127 beds in Florida.

Last survey on record

Aug 21, 2025

445 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.675.29
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.16—
Annual nurse turnover52.1%46.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$114,162 across 7 penalties
Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG525.0%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1050.0%E525.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 20 of the 55 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6004×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F5571×

    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.

  • F5651×

    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.

  • F5801×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Douglas Jacobson State Veterans Nursing Home, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Feb 11, 2025

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy on Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation/Misappropriation of Resident Property last revised 3/1/24 revealed abuse is defined as, any willful act or failure to act which causes or is likely to cause significant injury to a resident's physical, mental or emotional health. Abuse can also include threats, intimidation, unreasonable confinement or punishment. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Oct 29, 2024

    Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to protect the residents' rights to be free from neglect by failing to follow the hot liquid safety procedures to ensure hot beverages were served at a safe temperature to prevent thermal burn for 1 (Resident #65) of 3 sampled residents. The findings included: The facility policy #1001 Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation/Misappropriation of resident Property, revised 3/01/2024 documented, Neglect means failure to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish or mental illness. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Oct 29, 2024

    Based on observation, record review, review of facility's policy and procedure, the facility failed to serve hot beverages at a safe temperature to prevent avoidable thermal burn for 1 (Resident #65) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. On 10/17/24 staff reheated a cup of hot chocolate and gave it to Resident #65 without ensuring the beverage was at a safe temperature. Resident #65 spilled the hot chocolate on his lap and sustained an avoidable second degree burn (affects the both the outer layer of skin and the layer beneath) to the left anterior thigh. The findings included: The facility policy #3124 Hot Liquid Safety, effective 7/15/24 documented Food and drinks will be served at a temperature that is appetizing to residents, but also minimizes the risk for scalding and burns . […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF580Sep 6, 2024

    Based on interview and record review The facility failed to ensure staff notified the physician of a change in condition for one resident (Resident #114) of seven resident surveyed for falls when after a head injury the resident's systolic blood pressure dropped and the resident's mental status changed. Findings included: Resident #114 was an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on palliative care with a history of Type 2 Diabetes, Dementia, Anxiety Disorder, Hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation, Makor Depressive Disorder, seizures, Anemia, with a Cardiac Pacemaker. According to the timeline provided by the facility, on 8/20/24 at 2:40 p.m. Resident #114 was redirected from an exit in the facility and while walking away from the exit had a witnessed fall with a head injury. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jun 2, 2023

    Based on record review, review of the policies and procedures, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the appropriate supervision, and assistance to prevent avoidable accidents for 2 (Resident #27, and #76) of 8 residents reviewed who were identified as being at risk for falls and sustained falls at the facility, including falls with major injury. The findings included: The facility policy 5240, Fall and Fall Risk Management effective 5/15/2017, documented The facility will ensure that the residents environment remains as free from accident hazards as possible and each resident receive adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 55 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 21, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 16, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 25, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 11, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 29, 2024Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Sep 6, 2024Standard and complaint7 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 2, 2023Standard4 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 7, 2021Standard2 findings
Show the 10 earlier surveys
  • Dec 5, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Mar 5, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 1, 2018Standard and complaint1 finding
  • Dec 7, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Oct 1, 2015Standard10 findings
  • Oct 30, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Oct 4, 2013—7 findings
  • Oct 5, 2012—3 findings
  • Sep 19, 2012—1 finding
  • Nov 4, 2011—8 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction