Deficiency Index

Diversicare of Lanett

Lanett, Alabama · CCN 015196

12 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
51
Surveys
12
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2022
’11’15’20’22
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/12

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
85
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
DIVERSICARE HEALTHCARE
County
Chambers · rural
Medicare-certified since
1977

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
2
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=5, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Apr 22, 2021

2,027 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day2.813.90
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.39—
Annual nurse turnover50.0%46.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD250.0%E—F125.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C125.0%
CMS’s current file: 4 of the 51 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Diversicare of Lanett, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 22, 2021

    Based on observations, interviews, and review of the facility's policies and documents, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in a sanitary and safe manner. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 58 residents who receive their meals from the dietary department. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Dry Food, effective 01/01/17, revealed, 1 .The floors, walls, shelves, and equipment in the storeroom with be kept clean and in good repair .3. Ceilings will be constructed in such a manner as to protect the food from leaking pipes, heat, and contamination 5. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Dec 7, 2022

    Based on interviews, medical record review and review of Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual Chapter 4, the facility failed to implement Resident Identifier (RI) #1's s care plan for two- person assist with Mechanical lift. This affected Resident Identifier (RI) #1, one of three residents for whom care plans were reviewed. Findings include: A review of the RAI Manual Chapter 4 October 2019 revealed . Chapter 4 Care Area Assessment Process and Care Planning . 4.7 . The care plan is driven not only by identified resident issues and/or conditions but also by a resident's unique characteristics, strengths and needs. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF761Apr 22, 2021

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to store a liquid topical medication in a locked compartment away from residents with dementia who independently use the toilet in one of three shower rooms. The dementia unit has 14 out of 15 residents who can independently use the toilet in the shower room on the unit. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 6.3 Storage and Expiration of medications, Biologicals, Syringes and Needles, revised 10/31/16, revealed Procedure . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF883Apr 22, 2021

    Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure administration or declination of pneumococcal and influenza immunizations for two (Resident Identifier (RI) #12 and RI #59) of the five residents sampled for immunizations. This failure created an increased risk for the residents to contract pneumonia and influenza. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Pneumonia Vaccination Policy (Patients and Residents), effective 11/28/16, indicated, Policy statement Pneumococcal vaccination is offered to all patients and residents that meet the eligibility criteria in accordance with current best practice clinical guidelines such as those from the CDC. Procedure 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for minimal, widespreadF732Apr 22, 2021

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to post the nurse staffing data on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift. This failure can result in residents and visitors not having accurate staffing information. Findings include: Observation and record review on 04/18/21 at 7:10 PM revealed the Daily Nurse Staffing Form posted in the entrance of the East Hall was dated 04/14/21 and contained staffing documentation for first shift (7:00 AM -3:00 PM) only. No additional documentation was recorded on the form. The East Hall is the main hall where nurse staffing is posted for all residents and visitors. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 51 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 7, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 22, 2021Standard4 findings
  • Jul 30, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 15, 2018Standard1 finding
  • Mar 9, 2017Standard8 findings
  • Feb 4, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Jan 15, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Mar 13, 2014Standard and complaint6 findings
Show the 4 earlier surveys
  • Feb 14, 2013—3 findings
  • May 3, 2012—13 findings
  • Aug 24, 2011—3 findings
  • Mar 25, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction