Delmar Gardens South
Saint Louis, Missouri · CCN 265310
14 surveys since 2013. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 35
- Surveys
- 14
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 184
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- DELMAR GARDENS
- County
- St. Louis
- Medicare-certified since
- 1987
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=9, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jun 11, 2026
151 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.42 | 3.15 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.44 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 55.9% | 58.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $23,520 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J19.1% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G19.1% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D545.5% | E218.2% | F19.1% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C19.1% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6894×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5771×
Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
- F6411×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6771×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F6841×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Delmar Gardens South, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jun 11, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) received adequate assistance to prevent accidents when staff performed a Hoyer (mechanical lift) transfer with a torn Hoyer sling on 05/06/26 after staff observed a tear in one of the straps of the Hoyer sling. All four Hoyer straps ripped during the transfer and the resident fell to the floor which resulted in fractures to both of the resident's femurs (the upper leg bone, that is the longest and strongest bone in the human body and is the structural link between the hip and knee) that required surgery. The sample was 6. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 13, 2024
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one resident (Resident #1) who required staff assistance with transfers and mobility when toileting. On 1/15/24, after the resident asked for privacy in the bathroom, staff did not ensure the resident was in a safe position. The resident fell and sustained an L2 (second lumbar spinal vertebrae in the human body) compression fracture (the fracture occurs when the bone collapses, and the front (anterior) part of the vertebral body forms a wedge shape). The sample size was 3. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Sep 17, 2024
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to label and store medications according to acceptable standards of practice, for two of seven medication carts reviewed. The facility failed to date insulin pens when removed from the refrigerator and placed in the medication cart. In addition, the facility failed to ensure narcotic medications were always maintained under double lock when not under direct supervision. The facility identified 14 medication/treatment carts. The census was 240 with 184 in certified beds. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Sep 17, 2024
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) failed to ensure two staff were present before providing care, which resulted in a fall where the resident suffered a skin tear to the left upper extremity (LUE), a purple bruise purple above his/her left eye with a laceration on top of the bruise (Resident #33). The census was 240 residents, with 184 in certified beds. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF919Dec 28, 2023
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow their policy when staff failed to acknowledge audible and visual call light signals located above the resident's door or answer call lights promptly for three residents (#1, #4 and #7). The census was 224. Review of the facility's Call Lights Answering policy, reviewed 6/2021, showed: -Purpose: To get to the resident when he/she calls for assistance; -To assist the nurse in meeting the resident's request; -Procedure: 1. Go to the resident as soon as he/she calls. Answer within 5-15 minutes. Emergency lights should be responded to immediately to prevent injury; 2. Ask the resident, in friendly manner, what he/she needs; 3. Turn off the call light so that others will know that it has been answered; 4. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 35 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 11, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 17, 2024Standard3 findings
- Feb 13, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 28, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Aug 10, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jul 8, 2023Standard1 finding
- Mar 2, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Oct 24, 2019Standard3 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
- Apr 18, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jan 9, 2019Standard13 findings
- Mar 23, 2018Standard3 findings
- Jul 20, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Dec 6, 2013—2 findings
- Feb 15, 2013—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Lutheran Convalescent HomeWebster Grovesno harm findings
- NHC Healthcare, KennettKennettno harm findings
- NHC Healthcare, Maryland HeightsMaryland Heightsno harm findings
- Westwood Hills Health & Rehabilitation CenterPoplar Bluffno harm findings
- Scenic Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterHerculaneum1 harm finding
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction