Delmar Gardens of Meramec Valley
Fenton, Missouri · CCN 265711
14 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 46
- Surveys
- 14
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 190
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- DELMAR GARDENS
- County
- St. Louis
- Medicare-certified since
- 2001
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 75 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Missouri.
Last survey on record
Dec 5, 2025
339 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.36 | 3.15 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.35 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 47.8% | 58.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1150.0% | E1045.5% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C14.5% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5541×
Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
- F5611×
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
- F5801×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Delmar Gardens of Meramec Valley, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Dec 5, 2025
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control standards by not implementing Contact Precautions (CP, precautions that reduce the risk of transmission of infectious materials by direct contact.) for one resident (Resident #19), failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for four of 30 sampled residents (Residents #2, #3, #71, and #179), and failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF607Mar 26, 2024
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to check for a federal indicator (identifies when an employee who has ever held a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) certificate has ever been found to have abused, neglected, or misappropriated resident property) through the state Nurse Aide (NA) registry prior to hiring a new employee, in accordance with the facility's abuse policies, for three of eight employees files reviewed. The census was 163. The administrator was notified on 3/26/24, of the past non-compliance. The facility has changed their process on newly hired employees and in-serviced staff on the requirement to check the NA registry on all newly hired staff ongoing. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Mar 26, 2024
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable standards of practice for infection control for one resident observed during personal care. The resident's urinary catheter tubing disconnected and fell to the floor. Staff did not cleanse the tubing and then re-inserted the tubing into the catheter port (Resident #19). The facility also failed to ensure 3 out of 8 sampled staff's two-step tuberculin (TB) skin test were read prior to staff working with residents. In addition, staff failed to change their gloves or sanitize their hands when exiting a resident room, and handled clean linen supplies. The sample was 32. The census was 164. 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF659Jul 26, 2022
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided or arranged were delivered by individuals who had the skills, experience and knowledge to do a particular task or activity, which included proper licensure or certification, by allowing a Level I Medication Aide (L1MA) to administer medications to residents in a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) for several months under the job title as Certified Medication Aide (CMT) to four sampled residents (Residents #4, #5, #6, and #7). The census was 160. The administrator was notified on 7/26/22 at 2:30 P.M., of the past non-compliance which occurred on 7/8/22. On 7/8/22, the administrator became aware of the violation. The facility in-serviced staff on the license and certification process for new hires. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Mar 1, 2022
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had complete, accurate, and individualized care plans to address the specific needs of the residents for five out of 29 sampled residents (Residents #58, #84, #4, #35 and #95). The census was 188 with 143 residents in certified beds. Review of the facility's care management policy, undated, showed the following: Purpose: To provide for management of resident care that is conducted systematically and comprehensively by a facility-wide (interdisciplinary) Team knowledgeable in current concepts of geriatric care. Resident care management should be consistent with the medical plan of care. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 46 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Dec 5, 2025Standard2 findings
- Apr 9, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Mar 26, 2024Standard and complaint4 findings
- Dec 8, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jul 26, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Mar 1, 2022Standard and complaint15 findings
- Apr 5, 2019Standard5 findings
- Apr 6, 2018Standard2 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
- Jan 31, 2017Standard1 finding
- Nov 9, 2015Standard3 findings
- Sep 10, 2014Standard1 finding
- Jul 12, 2013—2 findings
- May 30, 2012—4 findings
- Apr 12, 2011—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Westwood Hills Health & Rehabilitation CenterPoplar Bluffno harm findings
- Scenic Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterHerculaneum1 harm finding
- Wilson's Creek Nursing & RehabSpringfield1 harm finding
- Crystal OaksFestus1 harm finding
- Springfield Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterSpringfieldno harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction