Deficiency Index

Delaware Veterans Home

Milford, Delaware · CCN 085051

27 surveys since 2009, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
195
Surveys
27
Harm or worse
8
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2009–2026
’09’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse8

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file23/27

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
144
Ownership
Government - State
Chain
Independent
County
Sussex · rural
Medicare-certified since
2007

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
2
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 44 facilities in Delaware.

Last survey on record

Mar 12, 2026

242 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day7.084.66
Registered-nurse hours per resident day2.46—
Annual nurse turnover54.0%32.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$118,757 across 2 penalties
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG29.5%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1676.2%E29.5%F14.8%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 21 of the 195 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6002×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F5581×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Delaware Veterans Home, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Mar 12, 2026

    Based on record reviews, interviews, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure four of nine sampled residents (Resident (R) 4, R46, R8, and R41) reviewed for abuse were free from resident-to-resident physical abuse. On 07/22/25, R8 pushed R4 to the ground. As a result, R4 sustained a closed left radius fracture, a closed, displaced, comminuted right proximal humerus fracture, and a closed, displaced right distal clavicle fracture. Findings include:. 1.Review of the facility's 5-day Follow Up Report dated 07/25/25 provided by the Administrator, revealed that at the time of the incident on 07/22/25 at 5:30 PM, staff heard someone screaming. Upon entering the hallway, staff observed R4 sitting on the floor holding his head. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Mar 6, 2025

    2. Review of R9's clinical record revealed: 1/16/24 - R9 was admitted to the facility. 12/18/24 6:43 PM - A nursing progress note documented that R9 had contacted 911 services due to having hallucinations. Due to the resident having a history of the behaviors, a note was left in the physician communication log and R9 had continued to be monitored. 12/19/24 9:30 AM - A physician's order was written for a urinalysis with a culture and sensitivity to be collected on 12/20/24. 12/20/24 - A urine sample was collected and sent to the lab for analysis and culture. 12/20/24 - A provider note by E13 (NP) documented, . Was asked to see patient [R9] today due to complaints of intermittent hallucinations unit manager reports patient having intermittent visual hallucinations. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 12, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff thoroughly cleaned and air-dried pots and pans as well as insured one of two can openers had been cleaned. This failure increased the potential risk of foodborne illness and had the potential to affect 61 of 62 residents that received food through dietary services. One resident received nutrition through tube feeding.Findings include:During an observation on 03/09/26 at 10:30 AM, three 6x6x6 stainless steel pans and six 6x24x6 stainless steel pans were stacked together on storage rack were noted to be wet inside with some food debris remaining. During an interview on 03/09/26 at 10:50 AM, the Food Service Director (FSD) stated, The pans are wet and they shouldn't be. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 10, 2021

    Based on observations and interviews it was discovered that the facility failed to ensure food was stored, distributed and prepared in a sanitary manner in accordance to FDA food standards. Findings include: The following was revealed during the initial kitchen tour and nourishment rooms on 9/2/21 from 8:30 AM to 10:00 AM: - The walk-in refrigerator had moldy blueberries and a cardboard box storing purple cabbage and bacon; - The hand washing sink in the dish room was blocked by carts; - The ice machine scoop was stored within the hand washing sink splash zone; - The dining room had unlabeled spray bottles; - The nourishment room on the Red Unit refrigerator was dirty with unlabeled sandwiches; - The nourishment room on the Gold Unit refrigerator was dirty on the bottom. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Mar 6, 2025

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for five (R1, R11, R64 and R66) out of nineteen sampled residents, the facility failed to have input from all required interdisciplinary team (IDT) members at the residents' care plan meetings. Findings include: 1. 2/11/08 - R1 was admitted to the facility. 1/15/25 - A quarterly MDS was completed. 1/28/25 - A quarterly care plan meeting note lacked evidence of input from the physician. 10/16/24 - A quarterly MDS was completed. 10/29/24 - A quarterly care plan meeting note lacked evidence of input from the physician. 7/17/24 - An annual MDS was completed. 7/30/24 - An annual care plan meeting note lacked evidence of input from the physician. 2. […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 195 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 12, 2026Standard and complaint7 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 6, 2025Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 25, 2024Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Apr 25, 2023Standard6 findings
  • Sep 10, 2021Standard and complaint15 findings
  • Jun 8, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Oct 12, 2020Complaint11 findings
  • Mar 4, 2020Complaint1 finding
Show the 19 earlier surveys
  • Nov 13, 2019Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Sep 4, 2019Complaint6 findings
  • Mar 27, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 23, 2019Standard and complaint17 findings
  • Jan 30, 2018Standard5 findings
  • Nov 4, 2016Standard9 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 14, 2015Standard15 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 5, 2015Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 12, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Feb 10, 2014—1 finding
  • Sep 25, 2013Standard10 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 20, 2012—1 finding
  • Aug 24, 2012Standard and complaint24 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 4, 2012—7 findings
  • Jul 7, 2011—1 finding
  • Apr 18, 2011—8 findings
  • Apr 14, 2011—2 findings
  • Feb 3, 2011—5 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 11, 2009—14 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction